Skip to main content
. 2011 May 27;8(4):471–482. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00326.x

Table 4.

Results from linear regression models for the association between docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid in breast milk and infant formula weighted by feeding method for the first 4 post‐natal months and Mullen Scales of Early Learning scores, PIN 2001–2006 [from PIN (1995–2006)] Babies Study (n = 266)

Mullen Scales of Early Learning DHA in breast milk and formula (continuous) AA in breast milk and formula (continuous)
β (CI) (unadjusted)*, β (CI) (adjusted) β (CI) (unadjusted)*, β (CI) (adjusted)
Gross motor 1.3 (−0.7, 3.2) 1.1 (−0.9, 3.1) 1.4 (−0.9, 3.6) 1.2 (−1.1, 3.4)
Visual reception −0.2 (−2.0, 1.7) −0.1 (−2.0, 1.8) 0.8 (−1.3, 2.8) 0.7 (−1.3, 2.8)
Fine motor 0.5 (−1.4, 2.3) 0.2 (−1.7, 2.0) 0.3 (−1.7, 2.4) 0.0 (−2.0, 2.0)
Receptive language 0.3 (−1.0, 1.5) −0.1 (−1.4, 1.2) 0.4 (−1.0, 1.9) 0.3 (−1.2, 1.7)
Expressive language −0.2 (−1.6, 1.2) −0.6 (−2.1, 0.8) 1.0 (−0.6, 2.7) 0.7 (−0.9, 2.3)
Composite −0.0 (−2.3, 2.2) −0.5 (−2.7, 1.7) 1.2 (−1.3, 3.7) 0.9 (−1.5, 3.4)

AA, arachidonic acid; CI, confidence interval; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid. *Unadjusted models include a variable for laboratory. Beta coefficient represents a change in fatty acid concentration of 1.0%. Adjusted models include laboratory, feeding method for the first four post‐natal months, infant sex, parity, smoking, education, race/ethnicity and preterm status.