Table 5.

Pairwise comparisons between DTR treatments for dengue virus serotype-1 dissemination in Aedes aegypti*

Day	Source	Constant vs. small			Constant vs. large			Small vs. large
		χ2	df	P	χ2	df	P	χ2	df	P
7	DTR	2.374	1	0.123	0.000	1	0.998	2.993	1	0.084
	Carton [DTR]	2.634	2	0.268	2.460	1	0.292	0.174	1	0.917
11	DTR	7.855	1	0.005	6.600	1	0.010	0.194	1	0.660
	Carton [DTR]	1.899	2	0.387	1.953	2	0.377	0.564	2	0.754
15	DTR	5.804	1	0.016	0.000	1	0.999	0.370	1	0.543
	Carton [DTR]	0.154	2	0.926	0.622	2	0.733	0.775	2	0.679
19	DTR	0.000	1	0.998	0.000	1	0.998	–
	Carton [DTR]	1.632	2	0.442	1.632	2	0.442	–
23	DTR	0.000	1	0.999	0.000	1	0.996	0.000	1	0.998
	Carton [DTR]	1.644	2	0.440	4.499	2	0.106	6.143	2	0.046
27	DTR	–			†			†
	Carton [DTR]	–			†			†

^*DTR = daily fluctuating temperature; df = degree of freedom. Dashes indicate that the test was not conducted because there was no difference in the response variables for these two DTR treatments (i.e., both cartons for both treatments had 100% infection).

^†indicates the test was not performed because there was only a single individual to test for the large DTR treatment. Values in boldface indicate that the effect was significant (P < 0.016) after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.