Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eat Behav. 2013 Feb 6;14(2):113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.01.006

Table 3.

Correlations Among Study Variables

Sex Income Pub-1 (Girl) Pub-2 (Girl) Pub-1 (Boy) Pub-2 (Boy) COEDS-1 COEDS-2 Restrict/Compens-1 Restrict/Compens-2 BMI-1
Sex -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Income .09 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Pub-1 (Girl) -- -.08 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Pub-2 (Girl) -- .12 .39* -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Pub-1 (Boy) -- −.09 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Pub-2 (Boy) -- −.08 -- -- .50* -- -- -- -- -- --
COEDS-1 −.31* .08 .18 .08 .05 −.10 -- -- -- -- --
COEDS-2 −.34* .06 .13 .11 .10 −.01 .73* -- -- -- --
Restrict/Compens-1 −.10 .10 .12 .06 .02 .02 .42* .36* -- -- --
Restrict/ Compens-2 −.20* .00 .17 .15 .12 .06 .42* .48* .49* -- --
BMI-1 −.02 −.14 .14 .01 .03 .04 .12 .16 .38* .37* --
BMI-2 −.01 −.19* .11 −.05 .14 .11 .10 .11 .32* .29* .75**

Note: The number following the variable represents the year in which the data was collected (i.e., 1 indicates year 1 and 2 indicates year 2); Pubertal status and sex are dichotomous so in those cases point biserial correlations were conducted. In all other cases, Pearson product moment correlations were conducted.

*

p<.01