Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 24;2013:392191. doi: 10.1155/2013/392191

Table 4.

Association between demographic factors and overall scores of knowledge, practice, and attitude toward CAM and western medication use.

Knowledge score Practice score Western medication use (%) Attitude score
β (95% CI) Mean (SE)a β (95% CI) Mean (SE)a β (95% CI) Mean (SE)a β (95% CI) Mean (SE)a
Age (yrs)
 >45 (n = 100) 1.97 (0.004 to 3.93) 26.2 (0.6) −0.45 (−1.32 to 0.43) 5.5 (0.3) −5.69 (−16.0 to 4.6) 45.8 (3.2) 0.45 (−0.22 to 1.12) 10.3 (0.2)
 36–45 (n = 108) 0.77 (−0.87 to 2.42) 25.0 (0.6) −0.33 (−1.07 to 0.40) 5.6 (0.3) −3.58 (−12.2 to 5.05) 47.9 (3.1) 0.32 (−0.25 to 0.88) 10.1 (0.2)
 ≤35 (n = 104) Ref 24.2 (0.8) Ref 6.0 (0.3) Ref 51.5 (4.0) Ref 9.8 (0.3)
Gender
 Men (n = 156) 0.26 (−0.84 to 1.35) 25.2 (0.5) 0.08 (−0.41 to 0.57) 5.7 (0.2) 4.71 (−1.04 to 10.5) 50.8 (2.6) 0.21 (−0.16 to 0.59) 10.2 (0.2)
 Women (n = 156) Ref 25.0 (0.5) Ref 5.7 (0.2) Ref 46.1 (2.6) Ref 10.0 (0.2)
Department
 Inpatient (n = 237) 0.84 (−0.42 to 2.11) 25.5 (0.4) 0.26 (−0.30 to 0.82) 5.8 (0.2) 3.48 (−3.15 to 10.1) 50.2 (2.2) −0.14 (−0.58 to 0.29) 10.0 (0.1)
 Outpatient (n = 75) Ref 24.7 (0.6) Ref 5.6 (0.3) Ref 46.7 (3.2) Ref 10.1 (0.2)
Length of experience in TM practice (yrs)
 ≥20 (n = 74) −3.23 (−5.24 to −1.21)** 23.3 (0.8) −0.69 (−1.59 to 0.21) 5.4 (0.3) −7.03 (−17.6 to 3.52) 44.1 (4.0) −0.97 (−1.66 to −0.28)** 9.5 (0.3)
 10–19 (n = 116) −1.14 (−2.63 to 0.34) 25.4 (0.6) −0.39 (−0.13 to 1.05) 5.7 (0.3) −1.18 (−8.97 to 6.62) 50.0 (3.0) −0.38 (−0.89 to 0.13) 10.1 (0.2)
 <10 (n = 122) Ref 26.6 (0.6) Ref 6.1 (0.3) Ref 51.2 (3.4) Ref 10.5 (0.2)
Number of patients seen per day (pts)
 ≥21 (n = 85) 0.79 (−0.74 to 2.31) 25.8 (0.6) 0.65 (−0.03 to 1.34) 6.0 (0.3) 6.94 (−1.05 to 14.9) 55.3 (3.2) −0.12 (−0.64 to 0.40) 10.0 (0.2)
 11–20 (n = 130) −0.66 (−1.97 to 0.66) 24.4 (0.6) 0.46 (−0.13 to 1.05) 5.8 (0.3) −6.67 (−13.6 to 0.24) 41.7 (3.0) 0.07 (−0.38 to 0.52) 10.1 (0.2)
 ≤10 (n = 97) Ref 25.1 (0.6) Ref 5.3 (0.3) Ref 48.3 (3.0) Ref 10.1 (0.2)
Running private clinic
 Yes (n = 77) 0.78 (−0.74 to 2.31) 25.5 (0.6) 0.56 (−0.04 to 1.15) 6.0 (0.3) 1.88 (−5.16 to 8.92) 49.4 (3.3) 0.35 (−0.12 to 0.81) 10.2 (0.2)
 No (n = 235) Ref 24.7 (0.4) Ref 5.4 (0.2) Ref 47.5 (2.2) Ref 9.9 (0.1)
Education in TM
 Graduate (n = 147) 2.75 (4.12 to 15.4)*** 26.5 (0.5) 1.12 (0.51 to 1.74)*** 6.3 (0.3) −3.54 (−10.7 to 3.64) 46.6 (2.7) 0.79 (0.32 to 1.26)** 10.5 (0.2)
 Undergraduate (n = 165) Ref 23.7 (0.6) Ref 5.1 (0.3) Ref 50.2 (3.0) Ref 9.7 (0.2)
Medical specialty
 OMD (n = 225) 1.48 (0.24 to2.72)* 25.8 (0.4) −0.10 (−0.65 to 0.46) 5.6 (0.2) −13.3 (−19.8 to −6.7)*** 41.8 (2.3) −0.36 (−0.78 to 0.07) 9.9 (0.1)
 GP (n = 87) Ref 24.4 (0.6) Ref 5.7 (0.3) Ref 55.0 (3.1) Ref 10.2 (0.2)
Hospital level
 National (n = 73) 2.77 (1.36 to 4.18)*** 26.5 (0.6) 1.06 (0.43 to 1.69)** 6.2 (0.3) 12.2 (4.86 to 19.6)** 54.5 (3.3) 0.07 (−0.41 to 0.55) 10.1 (0.2)
 Provincial (n = 239) Ref 23.7 (0.5) Ref 5.2 (0.2) Ref 42.3 (2.4) Ref 10.0 (0.2)

Linear regression analysis in which age, gender, department, length of experience in TM practice (yrs), number of patients seen per day, experience running a private clinic, education in TM, specialty type, and hospital level were considered predictive factors. β (95% CI) beta coefficient and 95% confident interval; aadjusted mean and standard error. Ref: the group was set up as reference. *P < 0.05;  **P < 0.01;  ***P < 0.001.