Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 6;27(7):2224–2232. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des098

Table I.

Selected characteristics of women who completed the protocol classified by the outcome of the index pregnancy.

Losses
Births
Trisomy Non-trisomy abnormal Chromosomally normal
(1) New York sample
  Number of women 38 17 11 50
  Age (years) at the blood drawa [mean (SD)] 34.4 (5.9) 32.2 (4.2) 30.8 (5.5) 35.0 (6.2)
  Ethnicity: White, non-Hispanicb,c (%) 97.4 94.1 90.9 94.0
(2) New Jersey sample
  Number of women 169 65 88 487
  Age (years) at the blood drawd [mean (SD)] 37.1 (4.6) 33.6 (4.2) 33.3 (4.9) 35.4 (4.8)
  Ethnicity: White, non-Hispanicb,c (%) 85.2 86.2 81.8 86.9

aMean age does not vary significantly with the outcome of the index pregnancy.

bAdjusted for age, ethnicity does not vary significantly with the outcome of the index pregnancy.

cIn the total sample, the 117 women who were not white, non-Hispanic include 59 Hispanics, 37 Asians, 13 blacks and 8 women of other or unknown ethnicity.

dMean age varies significantly (P< 0.0001) with the outcome of the index pregnancy. As expected, women with trisomy losses are significantly older than women with non-trisomy losses. Because live birth controls were age matched to women with losses, women with births are significantly younger than women with trisomy losses and significantly older than women with non-trisomy losses.