Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2012 Apr 26;74(2):285–299. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.009

Table 2.

Summary of De Novo Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs) in 343 SSC Families

SNV Effect 40× (High)
Coverage
All Loci
Proband Sibling Proband Sibling Proband F (29) Proband M (314) Sibling F (182) Sibling M (161) Both Total
Splice site 4 1 6 3 1 5 1 2 0 9
Nonsense 15 7 19 9 3 16 6 3 2 30
Missense 125 121 207 207 19 188 116 91 3 417
Synonymous 53 42 79 69 8 71 43 26 4 152
Promoter 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2
UTR 5 7 8 9 0 8 3 6 0 17
Intron 34 35 59 64 5 54 38 26 1 124
Intergenic 0 2 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 3
Total 236 216 380 364 36 344 209 155 10 754

De novo SNVs were tabulated according to affected status, gender, and type of mutation. Data under “40×coverage” indicate variants in the subset of the exome target region in which all members of a given family were covered by at least 40 sequence reads. The power to detect de novo variants in children from this well-covered portion of the target is very high, and we found no bias in coverage between affected and unaffected children. No significant difference was seen for missense mutations (125 in probands to 121 in unaffected siblings), but larger ratios of nonsense (15:7) and splice site (4:1) mutations were observed in probands relative to unaffected siblings. When we expanded our set of calls to include every variant that passed our thresholds (under “all loci”; see Experimental Procedures), similar ratios were observed. Probands and unaffected siblings are further subdivided based on gender: “proband F” indicates an affected female; “proband M” an affected male; “sibling F” an unaffected female; and “sibling M” an unaffected male. In parentheses, we indicate the number of children with the corresponding affected status and gender. The “both” column shows de novo SNVs that were shared by both siblings from the same family.