Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013 Feb 8;45(1):23–31. doi: 10.1363/4502313

TABLE 2.

Mean scores on the Benefits of Childbearing scale, and coefficients (and 95% confidence intervals) from multivariate regression analyses assessing differences in mean scores, by selected participant characteristics

Characteristic Mean score Coefficient
Age na −0.04 (−0.07 to −0.02)***
Race/ethnicity
Black −0.01 ref
Latina 0.05 0.04 (−0.10–0.17)
White −0.23 −0.20 (−0.38 to −0.03)*
Asian/Pacific Islander 0.21 0.28 (0.10–0.47)**,
Mixed/other −0.01 0.02 (−0.22–0.25)
Mother’s education
≤high school 0.07 ref
>high school −0.12 −0.14 (−0.25 to −0.03)*
Has any children
No 0.00 ref
Yes 0.01 0.03 (−0.11–0.18)
School/employment status
Neither in school nor employed −0.03 ref
In school or employed 0.13 0.21 (0.06–0.35)**
Baseline contraceptive method
Pill −0.05 ref
Patch 0.06 0.12 (−0.02–0.26)
Ring 0.13 −0.04 (−0.19–0.12)
Injectable −0.16 0.20 (0.05–0.34)**,§
*

p≤.05.

**

p≤.01.

***

p≤.001.

Differs from white and Asian/Pacific Islander at p≤.01.

Differs from white at p≤.001.

§

Differs from ring at p≤.01.

Notes: Scores were standardized for regression analyses (mean, 0; standard deviation, 1; range, −3.1–4.3). The model controls for recruitment clinic and interview mode; scores did not differ by these variables. na=not applicable. ref=reference group.