Table 4. ß-values (± se) of the models that included a weather variable with the highest support from the data.
Dunnock | Blackbird | Reed Warbler | Blackcap | Chiffchaff | Willow Warbler | Reed Bunting | |
Model 1 | AgeNAO: −1.370±0.3931 | Age: −2.713±0.3431 | AgeNAO: −0.788±0.3831 | Age: −2.275±0.3121 | Age: −1.433±0.2161 | Age: −1.374±0.2251 | Age: −1.374±0.1691 |
NAOfy: −0.171±0.085 | wtfy: 0.432±0.1681 | NAOfy: 0.137±0.0621 | pGzfy: −0.028±0.011 | snfy: −0.255±0.0701 | snfy: −0.154±0.0991 | pSpfy: −0.011±0.0031 | |
NAOad: 0.163±0.1301 | wtad: 0.430±0.3181 | NAOad: 0.068±0.0911 | pGzad: −0.029±0.020 | snad: −0.247±0.1581 | snad: −0.413±0.1801 | pSpad: −0.007±0.0051 | |
Model 2 | Age: −1.716±0.3531 | Age: −2.667±0.3451 | Age: −0.673±0.3741 | Age: −2.173±0.2971 | Age: −1.496±0.2261 | ||
wtfy: −0.304±0.171 | snfy: −0.131±0.6721 | pSpfy: −0.009±0.0051 | pSpfy: −0.009±0.0041 | pSpfy: 0.011±0.004 | |||
wtad: 0.355±0.2581 | snad: −0.839±0.3601 | pSpad: −0.013±0.0091 | pSpad: 0.014±0.010 | pSpad: 0.003±0.008 | |||
Model 3 | Age: −2.537±0.5761 | Age: −0.493±0.4531 | Age: −1.610±0.4021 | ||||
pSzfy: −0.002±0.005 | pSzfy: 0.002±0.0031 | Tfy: 0.037±<0.001 | |||||
pSzad: 0.003±0.0021 | pSzad: 0.001±0.0011 | Tad: 0.017±0.016 | |||||
Model 4 | Age: −1.942±0.3131 | ||||||
pSzfy: −0.002±0.003 | |||||||
pSzad: 0.002±0.0011 |
Shown are the ß-values for the factor age (negative values indicate a lower apparent survival probability of first year birds) and for the climate variable for both age classes (fy: first year birds, ad: adult birds) for the most parsimonious model (Model 1) of the species and for the models with a ΔAICC ≤2.0 (Models 2–4). The models are indicated by the variables that are used to estimate apparent survival. 1: regression coefficients whose signs are consistent with a priori expectations. Note that we had no a priori expectations for the sign of the coefficient for the model including a constant trend in survival probability for the willow warbler.