Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Parent Sci Pract. 2013 Feb 5;13(2):113–132. doi: 10.1080/15295192.2012.709152

TABLE 4.

Steps in Model-Building to Predict Maternal Negative Emotion Total with Child Anger Composite and Number of Epochs of Misbehavior

Effect Estimate Error t df p<
Unconditional time model (AIC = 3059.4; BIC = 3073.3)
  Intercept 16.175 .53 30.69 376 .01
 Time −.342 .08 −4.08 355 .01
 Time2 .008 .00 3.00 355 .01
Combined main effects model (AIC = 2988.1; BIC = 3013.2)
  Intercept 16.081 .49 32.69 362 .01
  Time −.348 .08 −4.55 356 .01
  Time2 .008 .00 3.51 357 .01
  WP anger .091 .15 .62 134 ns
  BP anger .816 .16 5.15 167 .01
  WP disruptive behavior .001 .08 .00 144 ns
  BP disruptive behavior .113 .08 1.37 156 ns
Final model (AIC = 2982.6; BIC = 3010.4)
  Intercept 16.182 .48 3.48 368 .01
  Time −.359 .08 −.47 356 .01
  Time2 .008 .00 3.22 355 .01
  WP anger −.160 .23 −.70 414 ns
  BP anger 1.052 .19 5.53 318 .01
  Time * WP anger .020 .01 2.00 379 .05
  Time * BP anger −.023 .01 −2.34 388 .01
  Time * WP anger * BP anger .004 .00 2.66 447 .01

Note. WP = within-person; BP = between-person; AIC = Akaike Information Criterion; BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion; df = degrees of freedom. Focus on the gift is not included here because it was not significant when included in a model with time and within-and between-person focus on the gift. It was dropped and only main effects for child anger and disruptive behavior were included in subsequent models.