Table 1.
MO (T0) | MO (T1) | HV | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
N1 latency, V1 |
133.7 ± 14.4 |
129.4 ± 13.4 |
138.9 ± 11.9 |
|
N2/P2 latency, V1 |
172.5 ± 10.0 |
166.3 ± 7.1 |
175.9 ± 16.7 |
|
N1 latency, hand |
162.7 ± 22.2 |
161.8 ± 20.8 |
172.9 ± 22.5 |
|
N2/P2 latency, hand |
200.5 ± 16.1 |
199.8 ± 16.4 |
212.1 ± 19.5 |
|
N1 amplitude, V1 |
5.2 ± 4.1 |
8.7 ± 4.2 |
10.0 ± 4.1 |
MO (T0) vs HV, p = 0.0047 (p = 0.009*) |
MO (T0) vs MO (T1), p = 0.03 | ||||
MO (T1) vs HV, NS (p = 0.26) | ||||
N2/P2 amplitude, V1 |
31.2 ± 18.5 |
34.1 ± 13.0 |
38.2 ± 9.3 |
MO (T0) vs HV, p = 0.0043 (p = 0.008*) |
MO (T0) vs MO (T1), NS (p = 0.34) | ||||
MO (T1) vs HV, NS (p = 0.29) | ||||
N1 amplitude, hand |
6.1 ± 4.7 |
6.3 ± 5.3 |
10.3 ± 5.1 |
MO (T0) vs HV, p = 0.018 (p = 0.036*) |
MO (T0) vs MO (T1), NS (p = 0.75) | ||||
MO (T1) vs HV, p = 0.014 (p = 0.028*) | ||||
N2/P2 amplitude, hand |
33.3 ± 17.6 |
34.7 ± 14.2 |
42.2 ± 18.0 |
MO (T0) vs HV, NS (p = 0.14) |
MO (T0) vs MO (T1), NS (p = 0.70) | ||||
MO (T1) vs HV, NS (p = 0.34) |
Statistical significance after Bonferroni correction is marked by *.