Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 27;5:17. doi: 10.1186/1758-5996-5-17

Table 2.

Correlations between C1q-APN, C1q and clinical features in men

  Log C1q-APN C1q
 
Univariate
Multivariate
Univariate
Multivariate
 
r
p
p
r
p
p
Age
0.1612
0.0002
0.0076
 
0.5661
 
BMI
−0.2490
<0.0001
<0.0001
0.1549
0.0004
0.2761
SBP
 
0.7847
 
0.2074
<0.0001
0.0098
DBP
 
0.7006
 
0.1975
<0.0001
0.2140
FBG
 
0.6776
 
 
0.0678
 
HbA1c
 
0.1992
 
 
0.7861
 
eGFR
 
0.6774
 
 
0.4865
 
T-cho
 
0.1970
 
0.1095
0.0149
0.0910
Log-TG
−01483
0.0009
0.1219
0.1949
<0.0001
0.2585
HDL-C
0.1095
0.0122
0.7865
−0.1845
<0.0001
0.0043
Brinkman index
 
0.2472
 
 
0.9811
 
adjusted r2     0.071     0.089

Data of C1q-APN and TG levels showed skewed distribution and were log-transformed before analysis. Significant level was set at p<0.05 (bold typeface). Multiple regression analysis was conducted to identify those parameters that significantly contributed to C1q-APN or C1q. Parameters with p<0.05 were subsequently entered into the regression analysis as independent variables (bold typeface). Abbreviations as in Table 1.