Summary
Epicardial fat accumulation may have important clinical consequences, yet little is known regarding this depot in HIV patients. We compared epicardial fat volume in 78 HIV-infected men and 32 HIV-negative controls. Epicardial fat volume was higher in HIV than control subjects (p=0.04). In HIV patients, epicardial fat volume was strongly associated with visceral adipose tissue area (VAT)(ρ = 0.76, p<0.0001), fasting glucose (ρ = 0.41, p=0.001) and insulin (ρ = 0.44, p=0.0003). Relationships with glucose and insulin remained significant controlling for age, race, BMI, adiponectin, VAT, and antiretroviral therapy. Epicardial fat may be an important fat depot in HIV-infected patients.
Keywords: HIV, epicardial fat, visceral fat, glucose, atherosclerosis
Introduction
Epicardial adipose tissue is hormonally active tissue that releases adipokines and fatty acids [1, 2] and may be important in HIV patients as it shares an embryonic origin with visceral fat [3]. In non-HIV populations, prior studies have shown associations between pericardial or epicardial fat and VAT [4, 5], insulin resistance [6], the metabolic syndrome [4, 7] and coronary calcifications [7, 8]. Although prior studies have investigated epicardial fat thickness by echocardiography in HIV-infected patients [9, 10], no studies have compared epicardial fat volume by CT in HIV and non-HIV groups. In this study we investigate epicardial fat volume in HIV and non-HIV patients with similar cardiovascular risk factors and body composition indices to determine whether epicardial fat accumulation occurs and the relationship of epicardial fat to metabolic abnormalities, including glucose parameters, in this population.
Methods
Design
In a prospectively recruited cohort of HIV patients and HIV-negative controls [11], we measured epicardial fat volume by MDCT and now present novel data comparing epicardial fat volume between the two groups, assessing the relationship of epicardial fat volume to body composition and metabolic parameters.
Participants
Subjects were recruited based on absence of known heart disease and cardiac symptoms with a goal to recruiting two groups with similar cardiovascular risk factors. Subjects were not recruited based on anthropometric or body composition parameters [11].
Assessments
Epicardial fat volume measurements were performed by a single experienced reader using a dedicated semiautomatic program (Siemens Medical Solutions) using similar methodology as previously described [12]. A region of interest was traced on the boundaries of the pericardial layers in every 10 mm with interpolation between the superior and inferior boundary. The top limit of the pericardium fat was the middle of the right pulmonary artery and the lower limit was the apex of the pericardial sac. Fat tissue was defined by voxels with Hounsfield unit (HU) between −30 HU to −190 HU [12]. Body composition and metabolic parameters were determined as previously described [11]. Lipodystrophy was scored as previously reported, rating face, extremities, neck or abdomen as 0–2 for each area[13].
Statistics
Comparisons between the groups utilized Student’s T-test and Wilcoxon test as appropriate. Univariate and multivariate linear regression were performed using SAS JMP.
Results
Seventy-eight HIV-infected men and 32 HIV-seronegative men were studied (Table 1). Epicardial fat volume was higher in HIV patients (112.3 [81.9, 158.7] cm3) compared to non HIV-infected controls (84.6 [57.7, 130.7] cm3) (p=0.04). In contrast, VAT, waist circumference, BMI and total body fat were not different between the groups, although the HIV group tended to have less subcutaneous abdominal fat. A minority of subjects in each group met criteria for the metabolic syndrome and the proportions did not differ between the groups (Table 1). 16% of HIV-infected participants reported having a major feature of lipodystrophy (score of 2 at one or more sites).
Table 1.
Controls (n=32) | HIV Positive (n=78) | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Demographics | |||
Age, y | 45.4 ± 7.2 | 46.5 ± 6.5 | 0.44 |
Race, % | 0.17 | ||
White | 59 | 68 | |
Black | 19 | 18 | |
Asian | 9 | 1 | |
Hispanic | 3 | 9 | |
Native American | 6 | 4 | |
Metabolic syndrome by NCEP criteria, % | 11 | 19 | 0.28 |
Framingham risk score | 7.0 ± 4.6 | 7.7 ± 5.1 | 0.50 |
Hypertension, % | 16 | 29 | 0.14 |
Diabetes mellitus, % | 3 | 9 | 0.23 |
HIV Disease Related Parameters | |||
Duration since HIV diagnosis, y | N/A | 13.5 ± 6.1 | N/A |
Ever on antiretroviral therapy, % | N/A | 95 | N/A |
Currently on antiretroviral therapy, % | N/A | 95 | N/A |
Duration of antiretroviral therapy, y | N/A | 7.1 ± 4.6 | N/A |
Current protease inhibitor (PI) treatment, % | N/A | 53 | N/A |
Duration of PI treatment, y | N/A | 3.8 ± 4.2 | N/A |
Current NRTI treatment, % | N/A | 91 | N/A |
Duration of NRTI treatment, y | N/A | 6.8 ± 4.5 | N/A |
Current NNRTI treatment, % | N/A | 49 | N/A |
Duration of NNRTI treatment, y | N/A | 2.6 ± 3.5 | N/A |
CD4+ T-lymphocytes (cells/mm3) | N/A | 523 ± 282 | N/A |
HIV RNA viral load (copies/mL) | N/A | <50 (<50, <50) | N/A |
Undetectable HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL, % | N/A | 81 | N/A |
Body Composition parameters | |||
Body mass index, kg/m2 | 26.9 ± 5.2 | 26.1 ± 4.3 | 0.43 |
Waist circumference, cm | 96.1 ± 15.8 | 95.8 ± 13.5 | 0.91 |
Hip circumference, cm | 102.1 ± 9.6 | 99.4 ± 8.5 | 0.15 |
Total body fat, kg | 19.8 ± 11.4 | 17.7 ± 7.7 | 0.27 |
Visceral adipose tissue area (VAT), cm2 | 149 ± 111 | 172 ± 121 | 0.35 |
Subcutaneous adipose tissue area (SAT), cm2 | 212 ± 138 | 167 ± 98 | 0.06 |
Epicardial fat volume, cm3 | 85 (58, 131) | 112 (82, 159) | 0.04 |
Metabolic parameters | |||
Fasting glucose, mmol/L (mg/dL) | 5.1 ± 0.5 (92 ± 9) | 5.2 ± 0.6 (94 ± 11) | 0.40 |
2-hr glucose, mmol/L (mg/dL) | 6.2 ± 2.3 (112 ± 41) | 6.8 ± 2.6 (123 ± 47) | 0.27 |
Fasting insulin, μU/mL | 5.1 ± 3.6 | 8.2 ± 8.4 | 0.05 |
Hemoglobin A1c, % | 5.5 ± 0.4 | 5.3 ± 0.6 | 0.17 |
Adipocytokines and Inflammatory Markers | |||
Adiponectin (μg/mL) | 4.6 (3.5, 7.2) | 4.0 (2.1, 9.0) | 0.41 |
MCP-1 (pg/mL) | 240 (195, 312) | 282 (192, 367) | 0.17 |
CRP (mg/L) | 1.8 (0.6, 3.5) | 1.6 (0.7, 4.0) | 0.82 |
Data reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or percentage, except for variables with non-normal distributions, which are reported as median (interquartile range). NCEP, National Cholesterol Education Program; NRTI, Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; NNRTI, Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors.
Relationship of Epicardial Fat to Body Composition and Metabolic Parameters in HIV Patients
Body Composition
Epicardial fat was associated with BMI (ρ = 0.48, p<0.0001), VAT (ρ = 0.76, p<0.0001), SAT (ρ = 0.39, p=0.002), total fat mass (ρ = 0.62, p<0.0001) and lean mass (ρ = 0.37, p<0.004). In a model including BMI, VAT, SAT, total fat mass and lean mass, VAT was the only body composition measurement that remained significantly associated with epicardial fat (β = 0.30 cm3/cm2, p<0.0001, model r2 = 0.57). Additional sensitivity analysis adjusting for body composition parameters as well as age, PI and NRTI use also demonstrated similar results. Among HIV-infected patients without the metabolic syndrome, similar results were seen.
Metabolic Parameters
Epicardial fat was positively associated with fasting glucose (ρ = 0.41, p=0.001), fasting insulin (ρ = 0.44, p=0.0003), 2-hour insulin (ρ = 0.25, p=0.04) and negatively associated with adiponectin (ρ = −0.26, p=0.04), CD4 (ρ = 0.28, p=0.02) and CD8 (ρ = 0.39, p=0.001), but not with CRP (ρ = 0.09, p=0.47), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (ρ = 0.08, p=0.55), or IL-6 (ρ = −0.05, p=0.73).
Coronary Atherosclerosis and Ventricular Function
No correlation was found between epicardial fat and plaque volume (ρ = −0.12, p=0.35), segments with plaque (ρ = −0.06, p=0.64), nor with calcium score (ρ = −0.02, p=0.89). All but 3 HIV patients had normal left ventricular function assessed by cardiac CT. Median epicardial fat volume was 156.7 [107.0, 241.1] cm3 in the 3 patients with decreased ventricular function and 110.6 [81.1, 158.7] cm3 in HIV patients with normal cardiac function.
Multivariate Modeling in HIV Patients
Epicardial fat remained significantly associated with fasting glucose (β = 0.10 cm3/mg/dL, p=0.02) in a model including age, race, BMI, adiponectin, VAT, current PI use and current NRTI use. Similar results were seen in modeling with fasting insulin (β = 0.07 cm3/μU/mL, p=0.03). Self-reported nadir CD4 count was available for 58 HIV-infected patients. After controlling for nadir CD4 count, epicardial fat volume remained significantly associated with fasting glucose (β = 0.08 cm3/mg/dL, p=0.005) and insulin (β = 0.09 cm3/μU/mL, p=0.0002).
Relationship of Epicardial Fat to Metabolic Parameters in Non HIV-Infected Patients
Among HIV-negative controls, epicardial fat was associated with age (ρ = 0.51, p=0.01), Framingham score (ρ = 0.55, p=0.005), diastolic blood pressure (ρ = 0.57, p=0.003), 2-hour glucose (ρ = 0.59, p=0.002), BMI (ρ = 0.81, p<0.0001), total fat (ρ = 0.88, p<0.0001), SAT (ρ = 0.78, p<0.0001), and VAT (ρ = 0.85, p<0.0001).
Discussion
The current study demonstrates that epicardial fat volume was significantly higher in HIV patients compared to a well-matched control group that did not differ significantly with respect to other body composition parameters. Among HIV patients, epicardial fat volume correlated most highly with visceral obesity, more so than overall adiposity or other body composition parameters.
In a prior study of HIV patients on HAART with lipodystrophy and the metabolic syndrome, epicardial fat thickness measured by echocardiography correlated with VAT and IMT [9]. In contrast, patients in our study were not recruited based on the presence of fat redistribution or the metabolic syndrome. Moreover, the majority of patients did not have the metabolic syndrome and the relationships with epicardial fat volume were similar and remained highly significant when analysis was limited to only those without the metabolic syndrome.
In this study we present novel data among HIV patients demonstrating a moderate but significant relationship between glucose parameters and epicardial fat volume that appears to be independent of other factors known to regulate glucose homeostasis, including VAT. Additional studies are needed to determine whether development of excess epicardial adipose tissue contributes to the insulin resistance in this population and whether reducing epicardial fat should be targeted in this regard.
Our current data demonstrate that CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes are associated with epicardial fat. T-lymphocytes are increased in the adipose tissue of obese humans, potentially playing a role in obesity-related inflammation [14, 15]. Studies are needed to assess if there is an independent relationship between epicardial fat and immune function in HIV-infected patients.
Our data demonstrate for the first time that epicardial adipose tissue, assessed volumetrically by MDCT, is increased in HIV patients and related to visceral adiposity. Epicardial fat is significantly associated with fasting glucose and insulin in HIV-infected patients, independently of traditional factors affecting glucose homeostasis. Investigation of the mechanisms, clinical significance, and potential therapeutic strategies for epicardial fat accumulation in HIV patients is needed.
Acknowledgments
Funding Sources:
Bristol Myers Squibb, Inc., NIH K23 HL092792 (Dr. Lo), K24 DK064545 (Dr. Grinspoon), T32 HL076136 (Dr. Shturman) and M01 RR01066-25S1.
Funding sources had no role in the design of the study, data analysis or the writing of the manuscript.
We wish to thank the participants of this study and the Nursing and Bionutrition Staff of the MGH and MIT GCRC. Funding Sources were Bristol Myers Squibb, Inc., NIH K23 HL092792 (Dr. Lo), K24 DK064545 (Dr. Grinspoon), T32 HL076136 (Dr. Shturman) and M01 RR01066-25S1.
Funding sources had no role in the design of the study, data analysis or the writing of the manuscript. Dr. Grinspoon received research funding for this investigator-initiated research project through Bristol Myers Squibb, Inc.
Footnotes
Disclosures:
Dr. Grinspoon received research funding for this investigator-initiated research project through Bristol Myers Squibb, Inc.
References
- 1.Mazurek T, Zhang L, Zalewski A, et al. Human epicardial adipose tissue is a source of inflammatory mediators. Circulation. 2003;108:2460–2466. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000099542.57313.C5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Iacobellis G, Corradi D, Sharma AM. Epicardial adipose tissue: anatomic, biomolecular and clinical relationships with the heart. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005;2:536–543. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ho E, Shimada Y. Formation of the epicardium studied with the scanning electron microscope. Dev Biol. 1978;66:579–585. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(78)90263-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rosito GA, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, et al. Pericardial Fat, Visceral Abdominal Fat, Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors, and Vascular Calcification in a Community-Based Sample: The Framingham Heart Study 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107. 743062. Circulation. 2008;117:605–613. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Iacobellis G, Assael F, Ribaudo MC, et al. Epicardial fat from echocardiography: a new method for visceral adipose tissue prediction. Obes Res. 2003;11:304–310. doi: 10.1038/oby.2003.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Iacobellis G, Leonetti F. Epicardial adipose tissue and insulin resistance in obese subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:6300–6302. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Iacobellis G, Ribaudo MC, Assael F, et al. Echocardiographic epicardial adipose tissue is related to anthropometric and clinical parameters of metabolic syndrome: a new indicator of cardiovascular risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:5163–5168. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rosito GA, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, et al. Pericardial fat, visceral abdominal fat, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and vascular calcification in a community-based sample: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117:605–613. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Iacobellis G, Sharma AM, Pellicelli AM, Grisorio B, Barbarini G, Barbaro G. Epicardial Adipose Tissue is Related to Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Visceral Adiposity in HIV-Infected Patients with Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy-Associated Metabolic Syndrome. Current HIV Research. 2007;5:275–279. doi: 10.2174/157016207780077084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Iacobellis G, Pellicelli AM, Sharma AM, Grisorio B, Barbarini G, Barbaro G. Relation of subepicardial adipose tissue to carotid intima-media thickness in patients with human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:1470–1472. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lo J, Abbara S, Shturman L, et al. Increased prevalence of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis detected by coronary computed tomography angiography in HIV-infected men. Aids. 24:243–253. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328333ea9e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nichols JH, Samy B, Nasir K, et al. Volumetric measurement of pericardial adipose tissue from contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography angiography: a reproducibility study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2008;2:288–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2008.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rietschel P, Hadigan C, Corcoran C, et al. Assessment of growth hormone dynamics in human immunodeficiency virus-related lipodystrophy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:504–510. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.2.7175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wu H, Ghosh S, Perrard XD, et al. T-cell accumulation and regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted upregulation in adipose tissue in obesity. Circulation. 2007;115:1029–1038. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.638379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Duffaut C, Zakaroff-Girard A, Bourlier V, et al. Interplay between human adipocytes and T lymphocytes in obesity: CCL20 as an adipochemokine and T lymphocytes as lipogenic modulators. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:1608–1614. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.192583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]