Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 2;11:81. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-81

Table 3.

Relationship of KAP1, TIMP1 and STC2 expression with pathological parameters of tumor

Clinical parameters KAP1
TIMP1
STC2
Low High χ2 P Low High χ2 P Low High χ2 P
N
13
99
 
 
12
100
 
 
11
101
 
 
Gender
 
 
1.52
0.22
 
 
0.68
0.41
 
 
3.08
0.079
Male
7
70
 
 
7
70
 
 
5
72
 
 
Female
6
29
 
 
5
30
 
 
6
29
 
 
Location
 
 
0.184
0.91
 
 
1.82
0.40
 
 
1.99
0.369
Proximal
1
11
 
 
0
12
 
 
0
12
 
 
Middle
4
32
 
 
5
31
 
 
5
31
 
 
Distal
8
56
 
 
7
57
 
 
6
58
 
 
Size
 
 
0.227
0.633
 
 
0.156
0.693
 
 
0.484
0.487
<5 cm
5
45
 
 
6
44
 
 
6
44
 
 
≥5 cm
8
54
 
 
6
56
 
 
5
57
 
 
Lauren classification
 
 
0.56
0.45
 
 
0.55
0.46
 
 
0.037
0.85
Intestinal
8
50
 
 
5
53
 
 
6
52
 
 
Diffuse
5
49
 
 
7
47
 
 
5
49
 
 
Histology
 
 
1.53
0.675
 
 
5.376
0.146
 
 
2.62
0.454
Papillary adenocarcinoma
0
5
 
 
0
5
 
 
0
5
 
 
Tubular adenocarcinoma
11
69
 
 
12
68
 
 
10
70
 
 
Mucinous adenocarcinoma
1
15
 
 
0
16
 
 
1
15
 
 
Signet-ring cell carcinoma
1
10
 
 
0
11
 
 
0
11
 
 
Histologic differentiation
 
 
0.013
0.91
 
 
1.97
0.16
 
 
0.10
0.75
Well-moderately
4
32
 
 
6
30
 
 
4
32
 
 
Poorly-undifferentiated
9
67
 
 
6
70
 
 
7
69
 
 
TNM Stages
 
 
24.31
0.001
 
 
36.46
0.001
 
 
20.26
0.001
I
7
7
 
 
8
6
 
 
6
8
 
 
II
4
36
 
 
2
38
 
 
3
37
 
 
III
2
37
 
 
2
37
 
 
1
38
 
 
IV
0
19
 
 
0
19
 
 
1
18
 
 
Lymph node metastasis
 
 
48.37
0.001
 
 
24.15
0.001
 
 
41.32
0.001
No
7
1
 
 
5
3
 
 
6
2
 
 
Yes
6
98
 
 
7
97
 
 
5
99
 
 
Distant metastasis
 
 
0.898
0.343
 
 
2.746
0.098
 
 
0.537
0.464
No
12
81
 
 
12
81
 
 
10
83
 
 
Yes 1 18     0 19     1 18