Table 2.
Network characteristics | Variable | Full sample (n = 2,150) |
Male (N = 1,132) |
Female (N = 1,018) |
TΔb | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b | SE | b | SE | b | SE | |||
Participant demographics | Female | −0.19* | 0.06 | – | – | – | – | – |
Black | −0.55* | 0.15 | −0.60* | 0.23 | −0.53* | 0.20 | −0.23 | |
Asian | −0.74* | 0.10 | −0.73* | 0.15 | −0.76* | 0.14 | 0.15 | |
Latino | −0.38* | 0.13 | −0.34 | 0.18 | −0.42 | 0.17 | – | |
Other | 0.15 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.02 | 0.48 | – | |
Age | 0.14* | 0.02 | 0.17* | 0.03 | 0.11* | 0.03 | 1.41 | |
Completed high school | 0.62* | 0.17 | 0.66* | 0.22 | 0.45* | 0.26 | 0.67 | |
Structural | Density | 0.46* | 0.20 | 0.60* | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.27 | – |
Total peer ties | 0.11* | 0.03 | 0.09* | 0.04 | 0.13* | 0.04 | −0.71 | |
Interactional | Emotional closeness | 0.44* | 0.09 | 0.48* | 0.13 | 0.39* | 0.13 | 0.49 |
Race homophily | −0.01 | 0.05 | −0.01 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.07 | – | |
Sex homophily | −0.03 | 0.05 | −0.04 | 0.08 | −0.07 | 0.08 | – | |
Avg. age of ties | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0.02 | – | |
Offline contact w/ties | 0.42* | 0.12 | 0.35* | 0.16 | 0.43* | 0.16 | −0.35 | |
R2 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
p < .05