Table 3.
Multivariate regression predicting number of drugs used in the last 30 days log transformed
Network characteristics | Variable | Full sample (n = 2,150) |
Male (N = 1,132) |
Female (N = 1,018) |
TΔb | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b | SE | b | SE | b | SE | |||
Participant demographics | Female | −0.02* | 0.01 | – | – | – | – | – |
Black | −0.03 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.05 | 0.02 | – | |
Asian | −0.03* | 0.01 | −0.02 | 0.02 | −0.04* | 0.01 | – | |
Latino | 0.01 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0.02 | – | |
Other | 0.27* | 0.04 | 0.24* | 0.05 | 0.32* | 0.05 | −1.13 | |
Age | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.01 | 0 | - | |
Completed high school | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | −0.03 | 0.03 | – | |
Structural | Density | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.07* | 0.03 | −0.05 | 0.03 | – |
Total peer ties | 0.01* | 0.01 | 0.01* | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | – | |
Interactional | Emotional closeness | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | – |
Race homophily | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02* | 0.02 | – | |
Sex homophily | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.01 | .01 | – | |
Avg. age of ties | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | – | |
Offline contact w/ties | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | – | |
Functional | Opinion ties | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | – |
Discuss ties | 0.12* | 0.01 | 0.14* | 0.01 | 0.09* | 0.01 | 3.54* | |
Accepting ties | 0.09* | 0.01 | 0.12* | 0.01 | 0.06* | 0.01 | 4.24* | |
R2 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.18 |
p < .05