Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Jan 19;26(4):337–344. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.01.003

Table 4.

Cycle characteristics and pregnancy outcomes for fertility preservation patients who thawed embryos.

Patient Age (years) Cancer type IVF protocol Oocytes retrieved 2PNs obtained Oocytes cryopreserved Embryos cryopreserved Embryos thawed Quality of embryos transferreda Gestational carrier Pregnancy complications Mode of delivery Outcome (weighting)
1 26.0 Breast A and /L 10 4 0 4 4 4cell grade 1.0; 5cell grade 1.5) Yes Twin gestation, preeclampsia Caesarean Preterm delivery at 36 weeks (2381 and 2580)
2 34.9 Breast LPL 28 19 0 19 4 2 cell; 5 cellb No Preterm labour Vaginal Term delivery (2920)
3 26.8 Breast 1st cycle LPL 10 4 0 4 4 5 cell grade 2.0; 3 cell grade 2.0 No Large for gestational age Caesarean Term delivery (4309)
2nd cycle A 18 10 0 10
4 34.2 Cervical A 8 7 0 7 4 4 cell grade 2.0; 4 cell grade 2.0 Yes None Vaginal Term delivery (3401)
5 43.1 Breast A 5 2 0 2 2 0 Embryos did not survive thaw
6 40.8 Breast A 10 2 4 2 2 0 Embryos did not cleave, oocytes still vitrified

All patients had day-3 embryos transferred.

a

Quality assessed using the Veeck's grading system (1989).

b

Embryo grades not available.

A = antagonist; LET = letrozole; LPL = luteal-phase lupron.