Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug;2(4):203–217. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0095

Table 4.

Pearson Correlation Coefficients from Columns in Table 2 were Fisher Transformed to Z-Scores and Compared Using Paired t-Tests, with the Resulting p-values Shown for the HU and BNU Data Set in the Upper and Lower Triangles, Respectively

 
p-Values of paired t-tests
  BOLD ALFF fALFF Hurst Std Mean GMV
BOLD 3.30e-02 5.92e-01 3.37e-01 3.42e-04 3.74e-07 5.11e-08
ALFF 1.95e-01 8.47e-04 9.41e-02 1.12e-03 1.28e-04 5.04e-05
Falff 8.80e-02 5.74e-01 4.85e-03 3.45e-05 5.24e-06 3.98e-06
Hurst 9.11e-03 3.27e-02 3.86e-02 1.06e-03 1.12e-04 8.01e-05
Std 7.95e-03 2.95e-03 1.93e-02 9.11e-01 8.77e-04 6.15e-04
Mean 5.31e-08 1.85e-04 1.27e-04 9.64e-03 9.08e-03 2.68e-03
GMV 3.17e-09 9.77e-05 6.79e-05 7.91e-04 9.59e-04 1.47e-04

Bold values highlight matrix elements below the p<0.05 threshold (corrected for 42 multiple comparisons), showing significant differences. For both data sets, typically mean and GMV values showed significant differences with other parameters, while ALFF, fALFF, and Hurst showed little difference among each other (excepting ALFF and fALFF for HU). Standard deviation showed significant differences with all parameters for HU, while differing significantly only with GMV for BNU.