Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 22;13:98. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-98

Table 6.

Trends on clinical outcomes, HRQoL and attitude toward treatment

 
DAI total score Mean (SD)
PANSS total score Mean (SD)
GAF Mean (SD)
CGI-S Mean (SD)
EQ-VAS Mean (SD)
EQ-utility Mean (SD)
SF-36 PCS Mean (SD)
SF-36 MCS Mean (SD)
  Non naïve Naïve Non naïve Naïve Non naïve Naïve Non naïve Naïve Non naïve Naïve Non naïve Naïve Non naïve Naïve Non naïve Naïve
Enrolment visit
43.9 (5.0)
41.0 (5.8)
85.5 (27.2)
98.2 (26.1)
54.6 (13.9)
49.9 (13.0)
4.2 (1.1)
4.6 (0.9)
63.7 (18.0)
63.3 (18.4)
0.71 (0.3)
0.68 (0.3)
47.8 (9.2)
48.3 (9.6)
39.5 (9.6)
37.1 (10.9)
Follow-up Examinatio2
43.9
41.7
79.8
81.1
57.1
58.6
4.1
3.9
66.2
67.8
0.74
0.76
48.2
48.7
40.6
39.8
(5.0)
(4.8)
(27.4)
(25.7)
(13.7)
(12.6)
(1.1)
(1.2)
(16.8)
(14.6)
(0.3)
(0.2)
(9.5)
(9.0)
(9.3)
(9.5)
Follow-up examination3
44.2
42.1
75.3
76.1
59.4
62.4
3.9
3.7
68.0
72.2
0.75
0.80
49.1
51.9
41.5
42.0
(4.8)
(5.1)
(27.0)
(24.5)
(14.3)
(12.0)
(1.2)
(1.1)
(16.6)
(14.4)
(0.3)
(0.2)
(9.3)
(8.1)
(8.9)
(8.0)
Follow-up examination4
44.2
42.6
71.4
66.9
61.4
67.6
3.8
3.4
70.5
75.5
0.79
0.81
49.7
53.5
41.9
43.0
(4.8)
(5.2)
(25.8)
(21.1)
(14.2)
(11.5)
(1.2)
(1.1)
(16.6)
(14.7)
(0.2)
(0.2)
(8.9)
(6.6)
(8.9)
(10.0)
Time effect*
F(2.7,1254) = 2.7 P = 0.053
F(2.3,1752) = 156.9 P < 0.0001
F(2.4,1752) = 132.6 P < 0.0001
F(2.5,1752) = 68.9 P < 0.0001
F(2.7,1581) = 25.9 P < 0.0001
F(2.8,1569) = 10.9 P < 0.0001
F(2.8,1434) = 14.1 P < 0.0001
F(2.8,1434) = 17.1 P < 0.0001
Time effect between subgroups* F(2.7,1254) = 1.1 P = 0.360 F(2.3,1752) = 22.7 P < 0.0001 F(2.4,1752) = 25.9 P < 0.0001 F(2.5,1752) = 14.3 P < 0.0001 F(2.7,1581) = 2.3 P = 0.080 F(2.7,1569) = 1.6 P = 0.192 F(2.8,1434) = 3.5 P = 0.017 F(2.8,1434) = 3.0 P = 0.033

*Time effect refers to the differences estimated between mean observations at any pair of examinations, during the observational period, on the full sample.

§ Time effect estimated comparing two subgroups: non naïve versus naïve patients.