Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 9;8(4):e61169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061169

Table 1. Comparison of the antimicrobials susceptibility between UPEC and commensal E. coli strains.

Antimicrobial agents UPEC isolates (n = 70) Commensal E. coli strains (n = 41) P value
MIC range (µg/ml) MIC50 MIC90 S% MIC range (µg/ml) MIC50 MIC90 S%
Piperacillin 1–256 128 256 14 0.5–256 2 64 73 <0.0001
Piperacillin/tazobactam 0.25–256 2 4 91 0.5–16 1 2 100 0.0539
Cefazolin 0.06–256 128 256 21 0.5–256 1 64 83 <0.0001
Cefuroxime 2–256 256 256 39 2–256 2 256 85 <0.0001
Cefotaxime 0.06–256 8 256 43 0.06–128 0.06 8 85 <0.0001
Ceftazidime 0.06–256 0.5 32 71 0.06–32 0.125 0.25 98 0.0007
Cefepime 0.06–256 1 16 79 0.06–8 0.06 1 100 0.0014
Imipenem 0.06–0.25 0.06 0.125 100 0.06–125 0.06 0.06 100 -
Gentamicin 0.25–256 64 128 43 0.5–256 1 64 85 <0.0001
Amikacin 1–256 2 8 90 1–4 2 2 100 0.0364
Ciprofloxacin 0.06–256 32 128 31 0.06–16 0.06 1 90 <0.0001
Nitrofurantoin 4–128 8 16 99 4–32 8 16 100 0.4420