Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 9;8(4):e60594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060594

Table 4. Multivariate analysis of factors related to practice and attitude toward FGM.

Favorable attitude for continuing FGM Experienced FGM
Women (n = 6,074)¥ Men (n = 1,583) Women (n = 7,048)§
Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Ethnicity
Wolof Reference Reference Reference
Other ethnic groups 7.71 (3.76–15.83) ** 5.22 (2.51–10.86)** 7.61 (4.56–12.68) **
Place of residence
Urban Reference Reference Reference
Rural 1.20 (0.82–1.75) 2.82 (1.09–7.31)* 1.45(.95–2.20)
Wealth
Lowest Reference Reference Reference
Second 0.98 (0.79–1.21) 0.81 (0.48–1.39) 1.08 (0.85–1.37)
Middle 1.14 (0.79–1.65) 0.84 (0.38–1.87) 0.67 (0.46–0.97)*
Fourth 0.74 (0.58–0.94)* 0.50 (0.29–0.86)* 0.63 (0.48–0.81)**
Highest 0.37 (0.28–0.50) ** 0.52 (0.28–0.93)* 0.45 (0.32–0.63)**
Education
No Reference Reference Reference
Koranic 0.68 (0.52–0.88)** 1.18 (0.65–2.16) 1.36 (1.06–1.73)*
Prim. Education 0.60 (0.47–0.76)** 0.67 (0.39–1.17) 0.93 (0.75–1.14)
Second. Education 0.35 (0.27–0.46)** 0.49 (0.29–0.82)** 0.65 (0.52–0.82)**
High (University) 0.19 (0.11–0.33)** 0.29 (0.16–0.52)** 0.69 (0.39–1.23)
Age
15–19 Reference Reference Reference
20–24 0.78 (0.64–0.94)** 0.77 (0.47–1.27) 1.00 (0.84–1.20)
25–29 0.67 (0.54–0.83)** 0.69 (0.41–1.15) 0.88 (0.70–1.10)
30–34 0.65 (0.52–0.82)** 0.64 (0.36–1.14) 1.14 (0.89–1.47)
35–39 0.47 (0.37–0.61)** 1.05 (0.53–2.11) 0.89 (0.66–1.20)
40–44 0.72 (0.53–0.97)* 0.57 (0.31–1.08) 1.02 (0.74–1.38)
45–49 0.54 (0.38–0.75)** 1.00 (0.46–2.18) 0.72 (0.52–1.00)
50–54 NA 0.68 (0.30–1.50) NA
55–59 NA 0.76 (0.33–1.76) NA
Working Status
Not working Reference Reference Reference
Working 1.10 (0.92–1.31) 0.92 (0.63–1.36) 1.80 (1.51–2.15)**
Interaction Term
Rural*working 1.78 (1.15–2.75)* 0.94(0.41–2.18) 1.27(0.83–1.93)
**

p<.001;

*

p<.05.

§

This analysis was done among those women who know (heard of) the practice of FGM; we excluded women who did not know of FGM, did not belong to one of the 4 major ethnic groups, and the missing variables.

¥

This analysis was done among those women who either approve or disapprove the continuation of FGM; we excluded women who did not know of FGM, did not belong to one of the 4 major ethnic groups, and the missing variables.