Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 9;8(4):e60594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060594

Table 5. Multivariate analysis of factors related to the practice and attitude toward gavage.

Favorable attitude for continuing gavage Experienced gavage
Women (n = 6,190) Men (n = 1,803) Women (n = 7,208)
Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Ethnicity
Other ethnic groups Reference Reference Reference
Arab 4.96 (3.07–8.00) ** 2.52 (1.53–4.18)** 17.46 (10.75–28.35)**
Place of residence
Urban Reference Reference Reference
Rural 1.47 (1.13–1.92) * 1.33 (0.69–2.56) 1.45 (1.12–1.89)**
Wealth
Lowest Reference Reference Reference
Second 0.76 (0.63–0.90)* 0.75 (0.54–1.04) 0.91 (0.77–1.08)
Middle 1.00 (0.70–1.43) 1.01 (0.60–1.71) 0.94 (0.68–1.28)
Fourth 0.63 (0.50–0.79)** 0.52 (0.32–0.84)* 1.19 (0.95–1.50)
Highest 0.58 (0.45–0.74)** 0.57 (0.34–0.95)* 1.23 (0.96–1.57)
Education
No Reference Reference Reference
Koranic 0.77 (0.64–0.93)* 0.81 (0.56–1.18) 2.13 (1.76–2.59) **
Prim. Education 0.64 (0.52–77)** 0.45 (0.31–0.66)** 1.27 (1.00–1.60)
Second. Education 0.35 (0.28–0.44)** 0.32 (0.22–0.47)** 1.05 (0.79–1.39)
High (University) 0.27 (0.15–0.50)** 0.13 (0.06–0.26)** 0.75 (0.41–1.35)
Age
15–19 Reference Reference Reference
20–24 0.86 (0.70–1.06) 0.60 (0.40–0.92)* 1.43 (1.14–1.79)*
25–29 0.82 (0.66–1.02) 0.69 (0.46–1.05) 1.63 (1.28–2.07)**
30–34 0.75 (0.60–0.93)* 1.90 (0.52–1.56) 2.18 (1.66–2.87)**
35–39 0.51 (0.40–0.67)** 0.54 (0.30–0.95)* 2.73 (2.10–3.55)**
40–44 0.49 (0.37–0.64)** 0.46 (0.25–0.86)* 4.10 (3.03–5.55)**
45–49 0.51 (0.38–0.68)** 0.50 (0.26–0.98)* 4.14 (3.02–5.67)**
50–54 NA 0.60 (0.29–1.24) NA
55–59 NA 0.55 (0.25–1.21) NA
Working Status
Not working Reference Reference Reference
Working 0.84 (0.69–1.03) 1.56 (1.06–2.29)* 1.01 (0.85–1.20)
Interaction Term
Rural*working 1.67 (1.22–2.28)* 0.75 (0.40–1.39) 0.69 (0.51–0.93)*
**

p<.001;

*

p<.05.

§

This analysis was done among those women who know (heard of) the practice of gavage; we excluded women who did not know of gavage, did not belong to one of the 4 major ethnic groups, and the missing variables.

¥

This analysis was done among those women who either approve or disapprove the continuation of gavage; we excluded women who did not know of gavage, did not belong to one of the 4 major ethnic groups, and the missing variables.