Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2013 Jan 16;69(1):101–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01809.x

Table 1.

Parameter medians and 95% central credible intervals for the analysis of the Gamma data sets featuring an exponential decay intervention. Based on 10,000 realizations after burn-in each.

Analysis Data Set Mixing (0.25) Intervention (0.1) Alpha (30) Beta (1.604) R0 (2.16) Predicted Epidemic Size
Exp 34 cases 0.23
(0.14, 0.32)
0.62
(0.07, 2.96)
NA NA 1.83
(1.13,2.74)
7
(1, 574)
Gamma 34 cases 0.20
(0.13, 0.28)
0.12
(0.05, 0.22)
29.78
(26.45, 33.17)
1.54
(1.21, 1.91)
1.69
(1.11,2.38)
17
(1, 173)
Exp 62 cases 0.23
(0.16, 0.31)
0.12
(0.04, 0.35)
NA NA 1.85
(1.23,2.68)
9
(1, 672)
Gamma 62 cases 0.21
(0.15, 0.28)
0.07
(0.03, 0.11)
29.73
(26.54, 33.23)
1.64
(1.30, 1.97)
1.79
(1.28, 2.39)
26
(1, 242)
Exp 122 cases 0.26
(0.20, 0.34)
0.12
(0.07, 0.22)
NA NA 2.13
(1.59,2.87)
36
(1, 1212)
Gamma 122 cases 0.26
(0.20, 0.32)
0.10
(0.07,0.14)
29.13
(25.93, 32.50)
2.22
(1.39, 1.97)
2.25
(1.76, 2.75)
78
(1, 475)
Exp 222 cases 0.27
(0.22, 0.32)
0.10
(0.07,0.15)
NA NA 2.11
(1.68,2.61)
43
(1, 1119)
Gamma 222 cases 0.27
(0.22, 0.31)
0.10
(0.08, 0.13)
28.81
(25.56, 32.16)
1.57
(1.34, 1.82)
2.28
(1.92, 2.70)
84
(1, 424)