Table 1.
Two-way ANOVA for identification of Clock suppressor or non suppressor strains in Figure 2A
| Suppressor strain | |||
| Strain name | F-ratio (Clock × strain) | p value | df |
| BALB/cJ | 14.698 | <0.001 | df(1,61) |
| A/J | 13.13 | <0.001 | df(1,44) |
| AKR/J | 9.41 | 0.004 | df(1,44) |
| C3H/HeJ | 56.82 | <0.001 | df(1,52) |
| DBA/2J | 34.92 | <0.001 | df(1,46) |
| FVB/NJ | 7.24 | 0.010 | df(1,47) |
| SJL/J | 12.03 | 0.001 | df(1,55) |
| 129S1/SvImJ | 7.094 | 0.010 | df(1,67) |
| Non-suppressor strain | |||
| C58/J | 0.65 | 0.423 | df(1,46) |
| BTBR_T+_tf/J | 0.01 | 0.911 | df(1,53) |
| I/LnJ | 2.72 | 0.107 | df(1,40) |
| MA/MyJ | 0.02 | 0.891 | df(1,52) |
| JF1/Ms | 0.49 | 0.490 | df(1,37) |
| MOLF/EiJ | 0.90 | 0.348 | df(1,37) |
| CZECHII/EiJ | 0.08 | 0.780 | df(1,46) |
Only the F-ratio for interaction is shown. Two-way ANOVA analyses for circadian period were performed with four groups; C57BL/6J WT, F1 WT, C57BL/6J Clock/+ and F1 Clock/+. Suppressor strains show a significant interaction between Clock genotype and strain background (Clock × strain).