Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 9;2:e00426. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00426

Table 3.

Apparent binding affinity (Kd) and maximal binding (Bmax) for CLOCK:BMAL1 and USF at four different E-boxes in Figure 7

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00426.013

CLOCK:BMAL1 CLOCKΔ19:BMAL1 USF1 WT USF1 ClockΔ19/ClockΔ19
Dbp EP-box
Bmax 0.97 ± 0.02 1.25 ± 0.05 * 0.83 ± 0.06 0.87 ± 0.04
Kd 2.01 ± 0.22* 32.94 ± 3.92 42.8 ± 9.30 49.56 ± 6.20
Dbp EI2-box
Bmax 0.79 ± 0.02* 2.38 ± 0.05 2.25 ± 0.05 2.10 ± 0.05
Kd 0.71 ± 0.10* 6.18 ± 0.54 6.10 ± 0.52 9.64 ± 0.96
Per2 E′-box
Bmax 0.26 ± 0.02* 0.43 ± 0.02 0.36 ± 0.03 0.41 ± 0.02
Kd 2.00 ± 0.64* 8.05 ± 1.57 17.81 ± 5.08 16.71 ± 2.46
Per1 EP1-box
Bmax 0.74 ± 0.12* 7.38 ± 1.18 3.06 ± 0.64 7.96 ± 2.01
Kd 16.55 ± 9.49 43.69 ± 19.40 33.36 ± 20.99 58.62 ± 37.82

Values are the mean + SEM derived from four-parameter nonlinear curve-fitting.

*

indicates that the Bmax or Kd is significantly different from other groups, p<0.0001.