Table 2.
Descriptive and Comparative Statistics between Subgroups by Sexual Partnership Characteristics
| Heterosexual | Heterosexual | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Sample N = 341 N (%) |
MSM N = 138 N (%) |
Men N = 87 N (%) |
Women N = 116 N (%) |
|
| Relationship Type | ||||
| Primary partners only | 214 (62.9) | 59 (42.8) a | 58 (67.4) b | 97 (83.6) c |
| Casual partners only | 84 (24.7) | 52 (37.7) a | 21 (24.4) a | 11 (9.5) b |
| Mixed relationship type partners | 42 (12.3) | 27 (19.5) a | 7 (8.1) | 8 (6.9) b |
| Partner Serostatus | ||||
| HIV+ partners only | 108 (32.3) | 43 (31.1) | 30 (34.5) | 35 (30.7) |
| HIV− partners only | 141 (42.3) | 37 (26.8) a | 39 (44.8) b | 65 (56.0) b |
| Unknown serostatus partners only | 56 (16.7) | 30 (21.7) | 10 (11.5) | 16 (13.8) |
| Mixed serostatus partners | 36 (10.6) | 28 (20.3) a | 8 (9.2) b | 0 (0) c |
Note: All participants came from SafeTalk, a safer sex intervention among adults in thesoutheastern U.S. (Golin et al., 2012). Mixed relationship type partners = both primary and casual partners. Mixed status partners = any combination of HIV+, HIV−, and unknown status partners. Categories that have different superscript letters within the same row (a,b,c) are significantly different from each other at the p < . 05 level with Bonferroni-adjusted post-hoc tests.
+
p <10,
*
p <05,
**
p <01,
***
p <001.