Abstract
Fuchs′ corneal dystrophy (FCD) is a common late-onset genetic disorder of the corneal endothelium. It causes loss of endothelial cell density and excrescences in the Descemet membrane, eventually progressing to corneal edema, necessitating corneal transplantation. The genetic basis of FCD is complex and heterogeneous, demonstrating variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance. To date, three causal genes, ZEB1, SLC4A11 and LOXHD1, have been identified, representing a small proportion of the total genetic load of FCD. An additional four loci have been localized, including a region on chromosome 18 that is potentially responsible for a large proportion of all FCD cases. The elucidation of the causal genes underlying these loci will begin to clarify the pathogenesis of FCD and pave the way for the emergence of nonsurgical treatments.
Keywords: cornea guttata, corneal endothelium, Descemet membrane, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, FCD, Fuchs′ corneal dystrophy, guttae, oxidative stress, unfolded protein
Fuchs' corneal dystrophy (FCD; MIM 136800), first described by the Austrian ophthalmologist Ernst Fuchs in 1910, is a common hereditary disease of the corneal endothelium [1–4,101]. The first clinical signs appear in approximately the fourth decade of life with the formation of excrescences in the central Descemet membrane termed guttae (Latin: drops), eventually progressing in some cases to corneal edema [5–7]. Clinically, the progression is typically graded on a 0–5 scale first used by Krachmer et al., with grade 0 indicating an absence of guttae, grade 1 representing 12 or more central guttae, increasing up to grade 5, denoting confluent central guttae with corneal edema [8]. The prevalence of FCD is generally considered to be approximately 4% in individuals above 40 years of age, although higher estimates have been reported in some populations; prevalences of 9, 6.5 and 21.6% were reported in Icelandic, Singaporean and inbred American populations, respectively [9–12]. The disease is typically inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion, although females are more typically affected than males by a two-to-one ratio, precluding strictly Mendelian population-wide autosomal dominant inheritance with high penetrance [1,4,8,13–15].
Two major genetic techniques have been used to investigate the genetic basis for FCD. Linkage analysis, which uses a panel of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) or short tandem repeat (STR) markers to identify a causal haplotype in familial cases, possesses the ability to identify regions harboring rare mutations, provided those mutations have a large effect (i.e., high penetrance). Linkage analysis is often followed by whole-exome genetic sequencing, which investigates all regions of the human genome that encode expressed proteins and can therefore find the causal mutation within a linkage interval, provided the mutation resides in a coding region. The second technique is the genome-wide association study (GWAS), which uses a SNP panel, often larger than those used in linkage studies, to genotype a cohort of unrelated individuals at hundreds of thousands or millions of SNPs. Because of the increased resolution provided by a larger panel, along with a sample size that is not limited by the constraints of a familial study, GWAS can detect regions of interest with greater resolution than linkage analysis (several kilobases for GWAS vs several megabases for linkage). GWAS can also identify smaller effects, identifying loci that are associated with predisposition to a disease, but which are not necessarily sufficient for pathogenesis. A major drawback of GWAS is its inability, due to the use of a panel of common SNPs, to identify an association between rare alleles and disease. To date, traditional techniques of linkage analysis, genetic sequencing and GWAS have succeeded in identifying three FCD genes and four causal FCD loci, along with numerous linkage peaks and susceptibility loci. However, the complex and heterogeneous genetic basis for FCD has thus far prevented the elucidation of the majority of the genetic load of FCD.
Pathology
FCD results primarily from a decrease in function of the corneal endothelium. A decrease in endothelial cell density, including discontinuity of the endothelial cell layer in some cases, has been observed using electron microscopy [16]. Function of the remaining endothelial cells may also be impaired, although data are mixed whether barrier function, pumping function, or both are impaired. In a study of FCD patients without epithelial edema, Burns et al. found an increase in endothelial permeability, but no difference in pump rate [17]. By contrast, Wilson et al. found no difference in permeability, but decreased pump rate in FCD endothelium [18].
Studies on isolated FCD corneas suggest that pump site density could vary based on disease stage. Geroski et al. found that in corneas with moderate guttae (i.e., relatively early-stage disease), Na+/K+ ATPase pump density was significantly increased [19]. By contrast, FCD corneas with a high density of guttae but without edema have a moderately reduced density of Na+/K+ ATPase, and edematous FCD corneas have a severely reduced density [20,21]. Recently, Kopplin et al. found that central corneal thickness increases with increasing severity of FCD, supporting a loss of pump and/or barrier function in FCD endothelium, even before the development of corneal edema [22]. Central corneal thickness was increased even in early-stage (Krachmer grades 1–3) FCD, suggesting that increased pump density may not completely compensate for decreased barrier function in early FCD.
Endothelial cell morphology is also altered, with the appearance of intracellular vacuoles, expression of epithelial characteristics such as desmosomes, along with cytoplasmic processes and collagen fibril production characteristic of fibroblasts [16]. The Descemet membrane is markedly thickened, and excrescences extend posteriorly, displacing the cytoplasm of overlying endothelial cells [16,23].
FCD loci identified by genetic linkage analysis
FCD1
The first locus linked to FCD, FCD1, was localized to a 26.4-Mb interval between 13pTel and 13q12.13 (Tables 1 & 2) [24]. Sundin et al. described a four-generation pedigree of a Caucasian family, recruited after examination of an affected proband. Consistent with the previously reported 2:1 sex ratio in individuals affected by FCD, females represented the majority of affected individuals in the family, with 21 females and only 11 males, although the overall number of females in the pedigree (n = 41) was similarly greater than the number of males (n = 24). A total of 13 affected and three unaffected individuals across three generations were recruited for genotyping, and linkage was determined using 399 STR markers from the MD10 genotyping panel, obtaining significant two-point logarithm of odds (LOD) scores of 3.91 at D13S1236 and 3.80 at D13S1304.
Table 1.
Fuchs' corneal dystrophy linkage peaks determined through genetic linkage analysis.
| Chromosome | Linkage peak | Maximum dominant HLOD | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | rs760594 | 2.02 | [30] |
| 5 | rs1301475 | 2.22 | [31] |
| 5 (FCD3) | D5S209–D5S425 | 3.39† | [27] |
| 7 | rs257376 | 1.92 | [30] |
| 8 | rs1380229 | 2.26 | [31] |
| 9 (FCD4) | D9S168–D9S1869 | 3.48† | [28] |
| 10 | rs1889974 | 3.37 | [31] |
| 13 (FCD1) | D13S1236–D13S1304 | 3.91 † | [27] |
| 15 | rs352476, rs235512 | 2.48, 3.53 | [30,31] |
| 17 | rs938350 | 2.10 | [30] |
| 18 (FCD2) | D18S487–D18S1134 | 3.41†, 2.89†, 2.45† | [25] |
| 20 | rs674630 | 2.17 | [31] |
| X | rs1990383 | 2.08 | [31] |
LOD score.
HLOD: Heterogeneity logarithm of odds; LOD: Logarithm of odds.
Table 2.
Causal loci for Fuchs' corneal dystrophy.
| Chromosome | Identified genes | Other diseases caused by mutations in the same gene | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5q33.1–5q35.2 | None | [27] | |
| 9p22.1–9p24.1 | None | [28] | |
| 10 | ZEB1 | Posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy | [28,32] |
| 13pTel–13q12.13 | None | [24] | |
| 18q21.2–18q21.32 | LOXHD1 † | Autosomal recessive sensorineural hearing loss | [25,41–43] |
| 20 | SLC4A11 | Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy and corneal dystrophy with perceptive deafness (Harboyan syndrome) | [37–39] |
Although mutations in LOXHD1 cause a portion of FCD2-linked disease, additional FCD2-linked familial cases exist which do not have LOXHD1 mutations, suggesting locus heterogeneity.
Slit lamp biomicroscopy and specular microscopy revealed phenotypically typical late-onset FCD. Notably, two children in the fourth generation of the pedigree were diagnosed with clinically significant disease: one 13-year-old girl with a Krachmer grade of 1, and one 10-year-old boy, with a Krachmer grade of 2. In each of these cases, both parents were affected, although genotyping data did not support the possibility that either pair of parents was consanguineous. The phenotype of the children, like the phenotype of other affected family members, was typical of late-onset FCD and unusual only in its age of onset.
Sequential retroillumination photographs taken over a 34-month timespan demonstrated a significant progression of FCD1-linked disease. The number of guttae in each cornea was observed to increase an average of 29% over the course of 30 months, exhibiting an exponential increase over time. A significantly increased density of guttae was also noted in the inferotemporal quadrant of the cornea relative to the other three quadrants.
FCD2
Sundin et al. localized FCD2, the second locus for FCD, to 18q21.2–18q21.32 in three large families [25]. FCD2 was the first locus identified in more than one familial case of FCD, suggesting the possible existence of a common locus for FCD on chromosome 18. Linkage analysis was performed on 43 affected and 33 unaffected individuals using 1107 STR markers, and maximum two-point LOD scores of 3.41, 2.89 and 2.45 were obtained for the three families. While the disease in all three families linked to the same region on chromosome 18, the disease-linked haplotype was different in each family, leaving open the possibility of heterogeneity of the locus.
Consistent with previously reported cases of FCD, the families linked to chromosome 18 exhibited autosomal dominant inheritance and an affectation rate that was biased toward women, with an observed total of 27 affected women and 19 affected men in three families. Unlike FCD1 and similar to more typical cases of late-onset FCD, none of the affected individuals had two affected parents and the youngest affected individual was 32 years old. Interestingly, the phenocopy rate in the three FCD2-linked families was 22%, significantly higher than the general population affection rate of FCD, suggesting the possibility of a multigenic cause in these families. In addition, 10% of individuals with the disease haplotype were unaffected, further highlighting the complexity of inheritance associated with this locus.
When two families whose disease links to the FCD2 locus were examined using retroillumination photography, the distribution of guttae was found to be similar to FCD1, although the course of the disease appears to be different [26]. Like individuals linked to FCD1, those affected by FCD linked to chromosome 18 had increased density of guttae in the inferotemporal region, suggesting that this may be a common characteristic of FCD. In contrast to FCD1, disease caused by FCD2 appears to progress more slowly, with a regression model suggesting that individuals with disease linked to FCD2 experience a 5% annual increase in number of guttae versus a 24% annual increase for FCD1.
FCD3
FCD3, the third locus for FCD, was localized to 5q33.1–5q35.2, with a maximum two-point LOD score of 3.39 [27]. A three-generation family comprising 26 individuals was collected, with 17 of those individuals examined by slit lamp biomicroscopy. Ten individuals were diagnosed with FCD, of whom eight were female and two were male. A SNP array was used to localize the causal locus to chromosome 5, and a STR panel refined the region to a 27-Mb interval. Analysis of Krachmer scores and ages of affected individuals revealed that FCD3 causes disease that is mild and progresses more slowly than FCD1- or FCD2-linked disease.
FCD4
A fourth FCD locus, FCD4, was recently identified in the region 9p22.1–9p24.1 [28]. Seventeen individuals from a four-generation pedigree were recruited, and an initial attempt to localize their disease under the assumption of Mendelian inheritance did not identify any regions of significant linkage. In some affected individuals, causal mutations were identified in ZEB1, mutations in which have previously been linked to posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy (PPCD) [29]. Reanalysis of the linkage data conditioned to the presence of the ZEB1 mutation identified the FCD4 locus on chromosome 9, with a maximum two-point LOD score of 2.43. The linkage region was refined using STR markers, resulting in maximum LOD scores of 3.09 at D9S168 and 3.20 at D9S256, and a linkage interval spanning 14.3 Mb between recombinations at D91681 and D9S1684. Notably, not all affected individuals in the family possessed the FCD4 haplotype. Either the FCD4 haplotype or the ZEB1 mutation was sufficient to cause a disease phenotype, and individuals who possessed both the causal FCD4 haplotype and the causal ZEB1 allele exhibited more severe disease than individuals with only one causal factor, demonstrating an interaction between the two pathogenic alleles [28].
Other linkage peaks
Using SNP linkage panels on a large cohort of FCD-affected individuals and their family members, Afshari et al. identified four new putative dominant FCD loci [30]. Linkage was performed using 92 individuals from 22 families, consisting of mostly small pedigrees but also including one large five-generation pedigree of 63 individuals, of whom only 22 were used for the study. The four loci identified were on chromosome 1, with a maximum two-point heterogeneity LOD (HLOD) score of 2.02 at rs760594, chromosome 7 (HLOD 1.92, rs257376), chromosome 15 (HLOD 2.48, rs352476) and chromosome 17 (HLOD 2.10, rs938350). Although this study did not identify dominant linkage peaks above the typical LOD threshold of 3.0, the authors speculate that testing a greater number of families may have given a significant result.
In a follow-up study, Li et al. identified additional linkage peaks using 215 individuals from 64 families [31]. Six linkage peaks were identified with maximum dominant HLOD scores greater than 2: chromosome 5 (HLOD 2.22, rs1301475), chromosome 8 (HLOD 2.65, rs2466216), chromosome 10 (HLOD 3.37, rs1889974), chromosome 15 (HLOD 3.53, rs235512), chromosome 20 (HLOD 2.17, rs674630) and chromosome X (HLOD 2.08, rs1990383). While only two of the peaks identified by Li et al. reach an HLOD threshold of 3.0, these linkage peaks and the peaks identified by Afshari et al. nevertheless may represent promising targets in understanding the causality of FCD.
Causal genes
ZEB1
ZEB1, encoding the Zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 transcription factor also known as TCF8, was initially identified as the causal gene in a family affected by PPCD (MIM 122000) [29]. Subsequently, Mehta et al. screened 74 Chinese individuals with FCD for ZEB1 mutations, identifying a novel variant, p.N696S, which was present in one sporadic case and absent in 93 control individuals [32]. While this represented the first mutation in ZEB1 suggested to possibly cause FCD, segregation data were unavailable, and functional analyses were not performed to confirm the connection.
Riazuddin et al. then identified a causal mutation in ZEB1 in a large multigenerational family whose disease also linked to the FCD4 locus on chromosome 9 [28]. The initial mutation identified was the missense mutation p.Q840P, and four additional pathogenic mutations (p.N78T, p.P649A, p.Q810P and p.A905T) were discovered when the exonic region of ZEB1 was sequenced in 384 unrelated FCD-affected individuals. Three of these mutations (p.Q810P, p.Q840P and p.A905T) occurred at sites that are highly evolutionarily conserved in vertebrates, while the remaining two occur at moderately conserved sites. An in vivo assessment of the functionality of the ZEB1 variants using zebrafish embryos revealed that, unlike wild-type ZEB1, injection of human mRNA containing each of the FCD-linked mutations was unable to fully rescue developmental abnormalities caused by morpholino oligonucleotide knockdown of endogenous ZEB1. Two variants, p.N78T and p.Q810P, partially rescued the phenotype, while the other three variants demonstrated phenotypes identical to morpholino injection alone. Importantly, while PPCD and FCD are both caused by mutations to ZEB1, all PPCD-causing alleles identified thus far have contained frameshift, nonsense, or lost-start-codon mutations, while FCD-causing alleles contain missense mutations [28,29,32,33]. Studies of PPCD corneas from individuals harboring ZEB1 mutations have noted overexpression of COL4A3, mutations in which cause cor-neal dystrophy associated with Alport syndrome (MIM 120070), suggesting a potential role for COL4A3 dysregulation in the pathogenesis of FCD [29,34].
SLC4A11
A second FCD gene, SLC4A11, encoding a sodium-borate cotransporter, was initially identified as underexpressed in FCD corneal endothelium compared with control endothelium in a study using serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) [35]. Later, Vithana et al. implicated recessive SLC4A11 alleles in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED), while Desir et al. identified other recessive alleles in Harboyan syndrome, which is characterized by corneal dystrophy and perceptive deafness [36,37].
Vithana et al. sequenced the SLC4A11 gene in 89 FCD-affected individuals, of whom 64 were of Chinese ethnicity and 25 were of Indian ethnicity [38]. Four previously unreported mutations were identified, which were absent in 354 ethnically matched controls: p.S33SfsX18 in a Chinese sporadic case, p.E399K in an Indian sporadic case, p.G709E in a Chinese familial case, and p.T754M in a Chinese sporadic case. Whereas the mutations in CHED were inherited in an autosomal recessive fashion [36], the alleles that caused FCD acted in an autosomal dominant pattern [38].
Functional analysis of the three missense mutations in SLC4A11 revealed significantly decreased total SLC4A11 protein in p.E399K and p.G709E transfected HEK293 cells, and decreased mature glycosylated SLC4A11 expression in p.E399K, p.G709E and p.T754M mutants when compared with wild-type-transfected controls. Confirming the previous SAGE results by Gottsch et al., Vithana et al. detected SLC4A11 expression in the corneal endothelium using reverse-transcription PCR [35,36].
Additional FCD mutations were identified in an American cohort by Riazuddin et al. after sequencing all coding regions of SLC4A11 in 192 FCD-affected and 192 unaffected control individuals [39]. The missense mutations p.E167D, p.R282P, p.Y526C, p.V575M, p.G583D, p.G742R and p.G834S were identified in FCD-affected individuals and were absent from all 192 sequenced control individuals, representing a statistically significant enrichment of these alleles in FCD cases. Four of the mutation positions, p.E167, p.R282, p.G583 and p.G742, were conserved across all species with an SLC4A11 ortholog, while two, p.V575 and p.G834, were conserved only in mammals; p.Y526 was poorly conserved. Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) and PolyPhen predicted that five of the mutations are pathogenic; p.E176D and p.Y526C were predicted to be benign. Similar to the results of Vithana et al. [38], HEK293T cells transfected with two of the variants (p.R282P and p.G583D) expressed decreased mature SLC4A11 protein relative to controls, while two others expressed increased immature protein (p.Y526C and p.V575M). Subsequent research by Liu et al. demonstrated that short hairpin RNA silencing of SLC4A11 in cultured human corneal endothelial cells decreased cell proliferation and viability and increased apoptosis, suggesting a possible causal mechanism for CHED and FCD due to SLC4A11 mutations [40].
LOXHD1
A third casual gene for FCD was recently identified on chromosome 18 by Riazuddin et al. [41]. The first causal mutation was identified in a family whose disease was previously linked to the FCD2 locus, although LOXHD1 does not reside in the FCD2 critical interval [25]. Due to the high phenocopy and impenetrance rate in individuals with FCD2-linked disease, Riazuddin et al. expanded the conservative linkage interval, defined by two recombination events at each boundary, by 5 Mb on each side, and designed a custom exon-capture array to sequence a total of 36 Mb on chromosome 18 [41]. One affected and one unaffected individual were sequenced in three families whose FCD linked to the FCD2 locus. In two of three FCD2-linked families, no coding causal mutation was identified, but sequencing did identify a p.R547C change in LOXHD1, a variant that was not previously identified by the 1000 genomes project or the 1500 exomes from the University of Seattle Human Exome Variant database. The p.R547C variant was also not found in 384 unaffected control individuals and was predicted to be pathogenic by PolyPhen 2.
LOXHD1 transcript was identified by reverse-transcription PCR in human cultured corneal endothelial cells at a level fivefold less than β-actin or GADPH. It was also observed in the epithelium and endothelium of harvested mouse corneas by immunofluorescence. Immunostaining of the affected proband with the p.R547C mutation demonstrated increased LOXHD1 staining in the Descemet membrane and corneal endothelium compared with non-LOXHD1 Fuchs cornea and a keratoconus-affected control, along with apparent aggregation of LOXHD1 protein.
Riazuddin et al. subsequently sequenced the coding region of LOXHD1 in 207 unrelated individuals with sporadic FCD, identifying 13 additional mutations that were absent in 192 control individuals and predicted to be damaging by the PolyPhen 2 algorithm [41]. To evaluate the functional significance of these additional mutations, two randomly selected variants, p.R157C and p.R751W, along with the original p.R547C variant, were transfected into cultured retinal pigment epithelium cells. All three mutants demonstrated punctate immunostaining for LOXHD1, reminiscent of the FCD phenotype and similar to the aggregates observed in the cornea of the affected proband.
Genetic associations
TCF4
In addition to the loci and genes causally linked to FCD, Baratz et al. identified an association between FCD and alleles of TCF4, a transcription factor located on chromosome 18 that resides within the FCD2 locus (Table 3) [25,42]. Baratz et al. performed a GWAS, correlating common SNP alleles with FCD status. One hundred and thirty cases were genotyped, along with 260 controls that were matched by age and sex with the cases. A second cohort, composed of 150 cases and 150 controls, was used to replicate findings.
Table 3.
Genes associated with Fuchs' corneal dystrophy, for which a causal relationship has not been established.
Of 338,727 SNPs, 11 demonstrated an association with FCD status, but only one reached the threshold for genome-wide significance: rs613872, located in the third intron of TCF4. The minor (G) allele at this locus was significantly enriched in FCD cases (T = 0.63, G = 0.37) versus controls (T = 0.86, G = 0.14), a finding that was even more pronounced in the replication group (cases: T = 0.57, G = 0.43; controls: T = 0.85, G = 0.15). Notably, the odds ratio associated with the minor allele was 5.5 for heterozygotes and 30 for homozygotes. A risk model, calculated using multiple logistic regression of four FCD-associated SNPs at the TCF4 locus, predicted FCD status with 76 and 78% accuracy in the discovery group and the replication group, respectively.
Since the publication of the initial GWAS results by Baratz et al., several studies have replicated the association between rs613872 and FCD in different populations. The largest replication study was performed by Li et al., with 450 FCD cases and 360 unaffected controls [31]. Confirming the results of Baratz et al., the minor allele of rs613872 was significantly enriched in FCD cases (cases: T = 0.53, G = 0.47; controls: T = 0.81, G = 0.19). The odds ratio associated with the minor allele was 8.0 under a dominant model.
Riazuddin et al. genotyped nine SNPs in 170 affected individuals and 180 controls, along with three large families previously linked to FCD2 on chromosome 18 [43]. In this cohort, a similar enrichment of the G allele of rs613872 was identified (cases: T = 0.612, G = 0.388; controls: T = 0.870, G = 0.130; odds ratio [OR]: = 4.2). The TCF4 SNP rs613872 did not fully segregate in any of the three FCD2 families, suggesting independence between the FCD2 locus and TCF4. However, rs613872 did partially segregate in one FCD2-linked family, preventing a strong conclusion from being drawn. Eight out of ten affected individuals were heterozygous for rs613872, while all four unaffected individuals were homozygous for the major allele. Of the two phenocopies, one was the daughter of two affected individuals, one of whom was not genotyped for rs613872.
Likewise, the association between rs613872 and FCD was replicated by Kuot et al. in an Australian cohort of 105 FCD cases and 275 unaffected controls [44]. The allelic distribution was nearly identical in this population to those studied by Baratz et al. and Riazuddin et al. (cases: T = 0.58, G = 0.42; controls: T = 0.85, G = 0.15; OR = 4.05) [41,42]. Three other TCF4 SNPs were also significantly associated with FCD: rs9954153, rs2286812 and rs17595731. In a group of individuals drawn from the inbred population of Tangier Island (VA, USA), Eghrari et al. also described similar findings [11]. The severity of disease was significantly higher in individuals heterozygous or homozygous for the minor allele of rs613872, and the minor allele of rs613872 corresponded with a lower prevalence of subclinical disease and a greater frequency of clinical disease.
Another study was conducted in a Chinese population by Thalamuthu et al. [45]. Fifty seven individuals affected by FCD, along with 121 unaffected controls, were genotyped for 18 SNPs within TCF4. While the minor allele of rs613872 was not present in the genotyped cohort, two other SNPs in TCF4 were significantly associated with FCD affectation with an odds ratio of >2. Upstream, the frequency of the T allele of rs17089925 was enriched (0.6228 for cases; 0.4174 for controls; OR: 2.381), as was the T allele of rs17089887, located in intron 3 (0.6491 for cases; 0.4504 for controls; OR: 2.567).
Across several different cohorts from diverse populations, polymorphisms near TCF4 have been consistently linked with an increased prevalence of FCD. However, a causal mutation in TCF4 has not been identified, and it remains possible that the association represents linkage between the TCF4 markers and a more distant causal gene.
CLU & TGFBI
CLU, encoding the molecular chaperone clusterin, plays a role in extracellular matrix interaction [46] and is overexpressed in FCD cornea relative to pseudophakic bullous keratopathy cornea and normal controls [47]. Similarly, TGFBI encodes TGF-β-induced protein, an extracellular matrix protein mediating cell adhesion, mutations in which are known to cause a variety of corneal dystrophies [48,49]. In their study of 105 FCD cases and 275 controls in an Australian cohort, Kuot et al. identified a significant association between FCD affectation and the minor allele of rs17466684 near the 5′-UTR of CLU (cases: G = 0.78, A = 0.22; controls G = 0.87, A = 0.13; OR: 1.85) [44]. An association was also identified between FCD and one TGFBI haplotype, spanning SNPs from rs756463 to rs10043360 (cases: TAAAT = 0.11; controls: TAAAT = 0.05; OR: 2.29). Notably, both CLU and TGFBI demonstrate increased expression in guttae of FCD cornea [50]. Although the associations observed by Kuot et al. have not yet been replicated in any other cohort, the localization of CLU and TGFBI to guttae suggests that these proteins may play a role in FCD, supporting the conclusion that variations in either gene may lead to pathogenesis.
Diseases with similarity to the FCD phenotype
COL8A2 endothelial dystrophy
An early-onset corneal dystrophy caused by mutations to COL8A2 has been referred to as `early-onset FCD', nomenclature that is not supported by clinical and histopathological evidence (Table 4). Of particular note is the fact that children of two FCD-affected parents exhibit an early-onset variant of FCD, suggesting the existence of a true early-onset variant caused by the same alleles as late-onset FCD, through homozygosity, compound heterozygosity at a single FCD locus, or inheritance of FCD alleles at two independent loci [24,51].Conflating early-onset dystrophy caused by COL8A2 mutations with these instances of early-onset FCD muddles the understanding of both diseases. Analysis of the similarities and differences between COL8A2 dystrophy and FCD can clarify which aspects of corneal physiology are commonly disrupted in hereditary endothelial dystrophy, while also elucidating pathways uniquely affected by each disease.
Table 4.
Genes that harbor mutations causing endothelial dystrophies similar to Fuchs' corneal dystrophy.
| Gene | Gene name | Function | Disease | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL8A2 | Collagen VIII α2 subunit | Structural/connective pression | Early-onset COL8A2 endothelial dystrophy | [52,53,55] |
| MIR184 | MicroRNA184 | Regulation of gene expression | EDICT syndrome | [60–62] |
| KCNJ13 | Potassium inwardly rectifying channel J13 | Ion channel | Snowflake vitreo-retinal degeneration | [63,64] |
Biswas et al. linked an early-onset endothelial dystrophy to the 7-cM interval 1p32.3–1p34.3 and used a positional candidate approach to identify coding mutations in the COL8A2 gene, encoding the α2 subunit of collagen VIII, a major component of the Descemet membrane [52]. Four potential pathogenic mutations were identified: R155Q, present in one familial case and two sporadic cases and absent in 92 control individuals, R304Q and R434H, each present in one sporadic case and absent in 75 controls, and Q455K, present in one familial case of PPCD and two familial cases of a novel early-onset endothelial dystrophy with similarities to FCD. However, a later study by Kobayashi et al. detected the R155Q variant in unaffected Japanese individuals (five out of 72 tested chromosomes), suggesting that it is a non-pathogenic allele [53]. Furthermore, the R304Q and R434H mutations have not been replicated in any other population, although a Q455V mutation has been associated with a similar early-onset dystrophy in a Korean population, supporting the pathogenicity of the Q455K allele observed by Biswas et al. [54].
An additional mutation was identified by Gottsch et al. in a family originally described by Magovern et al. [55,56]. Corneal disease in a large six-generation family was initially linked to 1p32–1p34.3, and the mutation L450W was identified in all 21 members with early-onset corneal dystrophy, along with one family member diagnosed with PPCD. The same mutation was subsequently linked to a phenotypically similar dystrophy in a British family by Liskova et al. [57]. Gottsch et al. examined the progression and structural features of the early-onset disease, comparing the family with the L450W mutation with 62 families affected by late-onset FCD [55]. Members of the early-onset family reached a severe Krachmer grade of 3 or higher approximately 40 years younger than individuals with late-onset FCD, a significant difference. Specular microscopy of COL8A2 dystrophy and late-onset FCD patients revealed striking differences between the two phenotypes. Whereas guttae in early-onset COL8A2 dystrophy appeared to be relatively broad with low elevation, guttae in FCD were very sharply raised with a greater elevation. In one individual with early-onset disease, large `mulberry-like' excrescences, characteristic of PPCD, were present with no apparent guttae.
In a subsequent study, Gottsch et al. compared the histological features of early-onset COL8A2 dystrophy caused by the L450W mutation, FCD of unknown cause, and normal control corneas [58]. The Descemet membrane was thickened in both COL8A2 dystrophy and FCD, although the degree of thickening was greater in the COL8A2 mutant. COL8A2 immunostaining of the L450W variant cornea revealed abnormal collagen structures, which colocalized to refractile structures in the Descemet membrane. Strikingly, the cornea affected by COL8A2 dystrophy lacked excrescences of the Descemet membrane, a pathognomonic feature of FCD. A second histological study, investigating two additional L450W corneas from the same family, found shallow atypical guttae in one individual, but did not observe excrescences in another more severely affected individual [59].
COL8A2 dystrophy has been modeled in murine transgenic systems, first through Col8a2 knockout and Col8a1/Col8a2 double knockout mice and later using the Col8a2G257D mutant mouse and a homozygous Col8a2Q455K/Q455K knock-in mouse. Hopfer et al. noted several anterior segment abnormalities in collagen VIII knock-out mice. Stromal thinning was noted in Col8a1−/− and Col8a1−/−/Col8a2−/− mice, but not in the Col8a2−/− single knockout. In contrast to human COL8A2 dystrophy, the Descemet membrane exhibited thinning in the Col8a1−/−/Col8a2−/− double knock-outs and to a lesser degree in the Col8a1−/− and Col8a2−/− single knockouts. A keratoglobus-like deepening of the anterior chamber was observed in Col8a1−/− and Col8a1−/−/Col8a2−/− mice, but not in the Col8a2−/− single knockout. Notably, no guttae were observed in any of the collagen VIII knockout strains.
Investigating the phenotype of the Col8a2G257D mouse, Puk et al. replicated many of the findings from collagen VIII knockouts. Both heterozygous and homozygous mutants exhibited reduced corneal thickness, with thinning of the epithelium, stroma and endothelium. Like collagen VIII knockouts, both Col8a2G257D/+ and Col8a2G257D/G257D mice had keratoglobus-like elongation of the anterior chamber. Both the corneal thinning and anterior segment enlargement were more severe in the homozygote, suggesting a semidominant mode of inheritance. No guttae were observed in either heterozygous or homozygous Col8a2G257D mice.
A later study by Jun et al. described a Col8a2Q455K/Q455K knock-in mouse expressing a mutation identified in human COL8A2 dystrophy patients. In contrast to Col8a2 knockout mice, no corneal thinning or anterior segment enlargement was observed in the Col8a2Q455K/Q455K knock-in mouse, and guttae were observed in the homozygous knock-in. However, the phenotype of the heterozygous knock-in mouse, analogous to human cases of COL8A2 dystrophy, was not documented.
The endothelial dystrophy linked to mutations in COL8A2, which was originally described as an early-onset variant of FCD, represents a phenotypically distinct disease. When compared with classic late-onset FCD, the early age of onset and atypical-pathological features of the COL8A2 disease indicate that it is not representative of FCD, but instead is its own distinct endothelial dystrophy. While COL8A2 endothelial dystrophy, like FCD, causes endothelial degeneration that eventually leads to stromal and epithelial edema, individuals affected by COL8A2 dystrophy typically lack the characteristic guttae of FCD [55,59]. Guttae have also not been observed in Col8a2 knockout mice and Col8a2G257D mutant mice, and have been described only in the homozygous Col8a2Q455K/Q455K knock-in. Furthermore, individuals with COL8A2 mutations experience an earlier onset of disease with very high penetrance and an equal sex ratio, in contrast to the late-onset, incomplete penetrance, and bias toward females seen in FCD. Although COL8A2 is not a classic late-onset FCD gene, it may nonetheless offer some insight into the pathogenesis of FCD.
EDICT syndrome
Another autosomal dominant disease with some phenotypic similarity to FCD is EDICT syndrome (MIM 614303), first described by Akpek et al. and later linked to 15q22.1–15q25.3 by Jun et al. [60,61]. Individuals affected by EDICT syndrome demonstrate a severe, early-onset syndrome of the anterior segment, characterized by endothelial dystrophy, iris hypoplasia, early-onset cataract, and stromal thinning. Similar to FCD patients, individuals with EDICT syndrome develop a thickened Descemet membrane with posterior excrescences. Other corneal abnormalities are also present in the form of overlapping endothelial cells, along with endothelial aggregates that stain positive for cytokeratin, also seen in FCD and PPCD [61]. Recently, a candidate gene approach identified a +57C>T variant in MIR184 as the causal mutation for EDICT syndrome, a result later confirmed by whole-exome sequencing [62]. MIR184 encodes the microRNA miR-184, which, like all microRNAs, regulates gene expression through mRNA degradation and translational inhibition. While the mutation in miR-184 is likely to affect the expression of a variety of targets, leading to the complex and severe phenotype of EDICT syndrome, analysis of its effects could shed light on the causation of the Fuchs-like endothelial phenotype.
Snowflake vitreoretinal degeneration
Similar to EDICT, snowflake vitreoretinal degeneration (SVD; MIM 193230) is an autosomal dominant syndrome with some similarities to FCD. SVD causes early-onset cataract, liquefaction of the vitreous humor, retinal detachment, and endothelial dystrophy [63]. In a family with SVD, cornea guttata segregated with the disease phenotype. Guttae were observed in four out of five prospectively examined affected individuals, and guttae were not observed in any individuals without SVD. The causal mutation for SVD has been identified as R162W in KCNJ13, encoding the inwardly rectifying potassium channel Kir7.1 [64]. While it remains possible that a FCD-causing mutation on chromosome 2 cosegregates with the causal mutation for SVD, Kir7.1 may interact with members of same pathogenic pathways that cause the endothelial dystrophy in FCD.
Extraocular phenotypic characteristics
Hearing loss
Recently discovered FCD genes, along with a self-reported hearing study, have raised the possibility that hearing loss is a component of the FCD phenotype. Recessive SLC4A11 alleles have been associated with Harboyan syndrome (MIM 217400), characterized by congenital corneal dystrophy along with perceptive deafness, developing in the first to third decade of life [37,65–68]. SLC4A11 has been described as a sodium-borate cotransporter, although in cells grown in borate-free medium, it is permeable to sodium and hydroxide ions [69]. SLC4A11 protein is expressed both in the corneal endothelium and in the lateral wall of the cochlea, which contains the stria vascularis, an epithelial tissue containing cells which, like the corneal endothelium, are derived from the neural crest [36,70–72]. Similar to the corneal endothelium, the stria vascularis is involved in maintaining fluid homeostasis in the cochlea, suggesting that defective ion transport by SLC4A11 in analogous tissues may be the cause of both ocular and auditory pathology in Harboyan syndrome [73]. SLC4A11 has also been localized to fibrocytes in the spiral ligament, which have been implicated in a similar role in maintaining fluid homeostasis [74,75]. The phenotype of Slc4a11-knockout mice demonstrates increased thickness of the basal corneal epithelium, along with collapse of the vestibular membranous labyrinth and hearing loss [75]. Taken together, these findings raise the question of whether the dominant mutations in SLC4A11 that cause FCD also result in an auditory phenotype.
A second hearing-related FCD gene was identified in LOXHD1. The function of LOXHD1 is unknown, although it is predicted to contain 15 polycystine-1, lipoxygenase, α-toxin (PLAT) domains. Mutations coding premature terminations in LOXHD1 have been identified in autosomal recessive hearing loss, and LOXHD1 protein localizes to cochlear hair cells in the ear [76,77]. Although substantially less is known about LOXHD1 than about SLC4A11, the involvement of LOXHD1 with both FCD and hearing loss likewise supports a possible hearing phenotype in FCD.
FCD and sensorineural hearing loss have also been associated in one case linked to a mutation in mitochondrial DNA, with a phenotype of early-onset corneal dystrophy and bilateral hearing loss, followed by tremor and deterioration of motor control [78]. While the majority of familial FCD cases demonstrate autosomal rather than mitochondrial inheritance, the concurrence of FCD and sensorineural hearing loss in this case provides further evidence of a link between endothelial dystrophy and hearing loss.
In an observational study, Stehouwer et al. examined the prevalence of hearing disability in severely affected FCD patients, compared with controls who had undergone cataract extraction [79]. Individuals with FCD who had undergone or were planning keratoplasty were recruited, and each was matched with two cataract surgery patients matched for age and sex. Individuals were provided with a questionnaire that included the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening test, which determines self-reported hearing disability and records factors that could affect hearing, such as a history of noise exposure. A total of 72 FCD patients and 144 controls were collected, of whom 50% were male and 50% were female. Stehouwer et al. found a significantly increased risk of hearing disability in severe patients, with an unadjusted OR of 1.59 (95% CI: 0.89–2.83) and an OR after adjustment for age, noise exposure and diabetes mellitus of 1.97 (95% CI: 1.04–3.75). This study provides further evidence for hearing loss as a copathology in FCD, although an empirical study using objective measurement of hearing acuity is necessary to draw a strong conclusion. While current evidence falls short of a proof of association between FCD and hearing loss, further investigation is warranted.
Pathways
Epithelial–mesenchymal transition
Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) may represent a mechanism for renewal and repair of the endothelium. Stem cell markers have been detected in cells of the peripheral endothelium, transition zone and trabecular meshwork, while additional markers of proliferation and maturation are present after endothelial wounding, suggesting that these cells may be activated and mobilized to fill gaps in the endothelium [80]. Defects in EMT could impair this mobilization and cause a defect in endothelial replacement, potentially leading to FCD. Consistent with this view, FCD genes discovered thus far have implicated the EMT pathway as a potential causal pathway in FCD. ZEB1, mutations in which cause FCD and PPCD, acts as a transcriptional repressor, downregulating E-cadherin and inducing a transition to a mobile, fibroblastoid phenotype [81]. Likewise, the E2-2 protein encoded by TCF4 induces EMT through indirect mechanisms, including upregulation of ZEB1 expression [82]. TGFBI likewise induces EMT [83], as does silencing of CLU, suggesting that CLU suppresses EMT [84]. Furthermore, silencing of the FCD gene SLC4A11 decreases proliferation, which is inversely correlated with motility in human corneal endothelial cells, suggesting a possible impact of SLC4A11 mutations on EMT [40,85].
EMT may also link the endothelial dystrophy of EDICT syndrome to FCD, as miR-184 regulates several members of the EMT pathway. miR-184 competes with miR-205, disinhibiting SHIP2, a regulator of the EMT-promoting Akt pathway [86–88]. miR-184 may also induce EMT by impairing miR-205 inhibition of ZEB1 expression [89,90]. Although functional studies are necessary to elucidate the role of EMT impairment on endothelial dystrophy, the implication of mutations in ZEB1 and MIR184 in FCD, PPCD and, EDICT syndrome, along with associations between FCD and variants of TCF4, TGFBI and CLU, suggests that EMT may represent a common pathway for the pathogenesis of endothelial disease. Notably, impairment in EMT leading to defective migration of replacement endothelial cells from the periphery could explain the fact that guttae first appear in the central cornea.
Oxidative stress & apoptosis
FCD endothelium exhibits increased markers of oxidative stress and apoptosis relative to control endothelium, leading to the suggestion that apoptosis as a result of oxidant–antioxidant imbalance is a causal mechanism for FCD [91–95]. Due to the production of oxygen radicals in mitochondria as a result of electron transport, mitochondria are particularly sensitive to a deficient antioxidant response, suggesting mitochondrial oxidative stress as one possible mechanism for the pathogenesis of FCD [96]. Indeed, in a SAGE study comparing FCD corneal endothelium with control endothelium, Gottsch et al. identified significant underexpression of several mitochondrial genes involved in electron transport and oxidative phosphorylation, including NADH dehydrogenase subunits 1, 2 and 4, cytochrome b, cytochrome c oxidase subunit III, and ATP synthase F0 subunit 6 [35]. Oxidative damage to mitochondria, resulting in decreased expression of mitochondrial genes, has the potential to impair survival of FCD endothelial cells and decrease the ability of remaining cells to maintain corneal deturgescence and clarity [97].
Supporting this hypothesis, FCD corneal endothelium exhibits reduced expression of antioxidant peroxiredoxins, and FCD endothelium and Descemet membrane have increased levels of advanced glycation end products associated with oxidative stress [93,98]. In a study by Jurkunas et al., additional members of antioxidant pathways were underexpressed in FCD endothelium relative to controls: thioredoxin reductase 1 (necessary to replenish peroxiredoxin), metallotheonein 3 (a reactive oxidant species scavenger), and superoxide dismutase 2 [95]. In addition, decreased expression was observed in genes associated with oxidative stress response: dual-specificity phosphatase 1, oxidative stress responsive 1, and angiopoietin-like 7. Neutrophil cytosolic factor 2, involved in reactive oxidant species metabolism, was significantly increased, while the expression of transcription factor Nrf2, which coordinates increased expression of antioxidant genes, was significantly decreased. Jurkunas et al. also found an increase in oxidative DNA damage in FCD corneal endothelium, with a marker for oxidative lesions localizing to endothelial mitochondria. Furthermore, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL), a marker of apoptosis, colocalized to cells with DNA damage in FCD endothelium, while both TUNEL and oxidative DNA damage were absent in control corneas. Importantly, markers for oxidative damage and apoptosis were also absent in pseudophakic bullous keratopathy cornea, suggesting a deficit in antioxidant activity that is specific to FCD. Treatment of cultured human corneal endothelial cells with hydrogen peroxide caused a decrease in Nrf2 and a similar pattern of oxidative DNA damage, mimicking the changes seen in FCD cornea. Likewise, ex vivo treatment of mouse corneal endothelium with hydrogen peroxide caused polymegethism and pleomorphism, similar to FCD changes in cell morphology.
A follow-up study by Azizi et al. compared the response of cultured FCD and control human corneal endothelial cells to oxidative stress [99]. Supporting the earlier study by Jurkunas et al., FCD cells had a significantly higher level of oxidative DNA damage than control cells. Furthermore, FCD endothelial cells exhibited a significantly increased level of p53 expression and significantly increased apoptosis after treatment with the oxidant tert-butyl hydroperoxide, suggesting that p53-mediated apoptosis after oxidative stress may represent a major contributor to cell death in FCD corneal endothelium. The in vitro and ex vivo studies on oxidative stress, combined with the association of FCD with alleles of CLU, a chaperone involved in oxidative stress response, suggest that oxidative stress response genes may play a causal role in the development of FCD pathology.
Protein folding
Unfolded protein response has also been implicated as a possible pathogenic mechanism in FCD. Engler et al. examined unfolded protein response in FCD corneas, corneas with non-Fuchs corneal dystrophies, keratoconus corneas, and normal controls, testing the hypothesis that the production of misfolded protein is increased in FCD [100]. In a masked examination of ten corneas with FCD and nine corneas with non-Fuchs' corneal dystrophy using transmission electron microscopy, all FCD corneas exhibited a prominent rough endoplasmic reticulum versus only a third of corneas affected by other dystrophies. FCD corneas also exhibited increased immunofluorescent staining for GRP78, phospho-eIF2α and CHOP, markers for unfolded protein response, while keratoconus corneas exhibited decreased staining relative to normal controls. Similarly, the apoptosis markers caspase 3 and caspase 9 were both significantly increased in FCD cornea, suggesting that increased misfolded protein in FCD may lead to an increased unfolded protein response and caspase-dependent apoptosis. Notably, CLU is involved in protein folding, while pathogenic alleles of LOXHD1 form misfolded aggregates in the corneal endothelium, supporting a possible role for improper protein folding in FCD. Unfolded protein response represents a possible explanation for the difficulty in identifying a common pathway for FCD: it is possible that pathogenic mutations could cause misfolding and/or protein aggregation in a wide variety of unrelated targets.
Expert commentary
To date, four FCD loci including regions on chromosomes 5, 9, 13 and 18 have been localized through linkage analysis of large families. Linkage analysis of a cohort including one large family and numerous small families has found another nine linkage peaks, on chromosomes 1, 5, 7, 8, 10, 15, 17, 20 and X. In addition, three causal FCD genes have been identified: SLC4A11, ZEB1 and LOXHD1. Mutations in other genes, causing distinct endothelial dystrophies with some similarity to FCD, have also been discovered. One gene, COL8A2, has been implicated in the causation of a similar corneal dystrophy with earlier onset but a unique histopathological phenotype, while mutations in MIR184 and KCNJ13 have been shown to cause ocular syndromes with FCD-like endothelial dystrophy. Furthermore, a GWAS has identified an association between the minor allele of the intronic TCF4 SNP rs613872 and FCD, while another study has found associations with rs17466684 near CLU, as well as with one haplotype of TGFBI. However, no causal relationship has been identified underlying these three genes.
Little functional data exist to explain how the heterogeneous causal mutations that have been identified, along with the presumed causal mutations underlying FCD-associated markers, contribute to the single disease of FCD. ZEB1, TCF4, CLU and TGFBI are involved in the regulation of EMT, but LOXHD1 and SLC4A11 are not known to have any effect on that process. CLU is also involved in antioxidant response, and ex vivo and in vitro studies of FCD corneal endothelium have suggested that deficits in antioxidant pathways may contribute to the FCD phenotype. Finally, CLU is involved in normal protein folding, and pathogenic variants of LOXHD1 show misfolding and aggregation of LOXHD1 protein, while increased unfolded protein response has been observed in FCD corneas ex vivo. Identification of the causal genes located in FCD loci will clarify the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of FCD, while continued functional analysis will suggest new candidate genes by elucidating the abnormal cell biology in FCD.
Five-year view
In the next 5 years, we will likely see a significant clarification of the genetic basis for FCD. Until now, the expense of genetic sequencing has greatly limited progress by making it cost prohibitive to sequence the exome or genome of every collected FCD-affected individual. Expense has also necessitated whole-exome instead of whole-genome sequencing, thus causing possible noncoding causal mutations to be ignored. Notably, the SNP rs613872, which is strongly associated with FCD, is located in an intronic region of TCF4, and therefore could not have been identified by whole-exome approaches. The rapidly decreasing cost of next-generation DNA sequencing, a trend that is likely to continue with the introduction of third-generation sequencing technologies, will result in a greater availability of whole-exome and whole-genome sequence data. Several research groups have collected DNA samples from large cohorts of FCD-affected individuals and unaffected controls, and inexpensive whole-genome sequencing will allow the identification of both common and rare disease-causing alleles, including noncoding variants, in these populations. Perhaps most notably, these advances may allow the causal alleles on chromosome 18 to be identified. Although FCD-causing mutations in LOXHD1 have been found, the causal mutations associated with the TCF4 SNP rs613872, as well as the majority of familial disease linked to the FCD2 locus, have not yet been identified. Chromosome 18-linked disease may represent a substantial proportion of the genetic load of FCD, so the identification of one or more causal mutations would represent a significant advance in our understanding of FCD genetics [25,42].
Key issues
Fuchs' corneal dystrophy (FCD) is a genetic disorder of the corneal endothelium, which represents a major cause of corneal transplantation in the developed world.
The genetic basis of FCD is complex and heterogeneous, with variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance.
Only three FCD genes (ZEB1, SLC4A11 and LOXHD1) have been identified, representing a small proportion of the total genetic load.
A common causal mechanism uniting the three causal genes has not been identified, although genetic and molecular biology approaches have implicated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, oxidative stress response and protein folding as three potential pathways involved in FCD pathogenesis.
Four causal FCD loci and nine additional linkage peaks for FCD have been isolated, along with three genes associated with FCD. However, the causal relationships that underlie these associations have not yet been identified.
Future research will identify the causal genes located in FCD loci in order to determine causal mechanisms and devise nonsurgical treatments.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Eye Institute grant R01EY016835.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
Footnotes
Financial & competing interests disclosure The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
References
Papers of special note have been highlighted as:
• of interest
•• of considerable interest
- 1.Fuchs E. Dystrophia epithelialis corneae. Graefes. Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 1910;76(3):478–508. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Clegg JG. Diseases of the cornea: remarks on dystrophies of the cornea and glaucoma, with especial reference to a familial variety of the former. Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. UK. 1915;35:245–253. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Moeschler H. Studies on pigmentation of the posterior corneal surface with 395 slit lamp microscope eye examinations of healthy individuals. Z. Augenheilkd. 1922;48:195–202. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cross HE, Maumenee AE, Cantolino SJ. Inheritance of Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1971;85(3):268–272. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1971.00990050270002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vogt A. Further results of slit lamp microscopy of the anterior segment of the eye. Albrecht von Graefes Arch. Klin. Ophthalmol. 1921;106:63–103. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Graves B. Notes on microscopy of the living eye: report of the Lang Clinical Research Scholarship, Royal London Ophthalmic Hospital. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1924;8(10):467–472. doi: 10.1136/bjo.8.10.467-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Friedenwald H, Friedenwald JS. Epithelial dystrophy of the cornea. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1925;9(1):14–20. doi: 10.1136/bjo.9.1.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Krachmer JH, Purcell JJ, Jr, Young CW, Bucher KD. Corneal endothelial dystrophy: a study of 64 families. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1978;96(11):2036–2039. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1978.03910060424004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Very large and systematic study of familial Fuchs' corneal dystrophy (FCD), which defined the clinical grading scale that is commonly used today.
- 9.Lorenzetti DW, Uotila MH, Parikh N, Kaufman HE. Central cornea guttata. Incidence in the general population. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1967;64(6):1155–1158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zoega GM, Fujisawa A, Sasaki H, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for cornea guttata in the Reykjavik Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(4):565–569. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Eghrari AO, McGlumphy EJ, Iliff BW, et al. Prevalence and severity of Fuchs corneal dystrophy in tangier island. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2012;153(6):1067–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.11.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kitagawa K, Kojima M, Sasaki H, et al. Prevalence of primary cornea guttata and morphology of corneal endothelium in aging Japanese and Singaporean subjects. Ophthalmic Res. 2002;34(3):135–138. doi: 10.1159/000063656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stocker FW. The endothelium of the cornea and its clinical implications. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 1953;51:669–786. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Doggart JH. Fuchs's epithelial dystrophy of the cornea. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1957;41(9):533–540. doi: 10.1136/bjo.41.9.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Good review of what was known in the first 50 years after Fuchs described FCD and an excellent report of the clinical features of the disease.
- 15.Louttit MD, Kopplin LJ, Igo RP, Jr, et al. FECD Genetics Multi-Center Study Group. A multicenter study to map genes for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: baseline characteristics and heritability. Cornea. 2012;31(1):26–35. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31821c9b8f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Iwamoto T, DeVoe AG. Electron microscopic studies on Fuchs' combined dystrophy: I. Posterior portion of the cornea. Invest. Ophthalmol. 1971;10(1):9–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Burns RR, Bourne WM, Brubaker RF. Endothelial function in patients with cornea guttata. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1981;20(1):77–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wilson SE, Bourne WM, O'Brien PC, Brubaker RF. Endothelial function and aqueous humor flow rate in patients with Fuchs' dystrophy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1988;106(3):270–278. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(88)90360-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Geroski DH, Matsuda M, Yee RW, Edelhauser HF. Pump function of the human corneal endothelium. Effects of age and cornea guttata. Ophthalmology. 1985;92(6):759–763. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(85)33973-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.McCartney MD, Robertson DP, Wood TO, McLaughlin BJ. ATPase pump site density in human dysfunctional corneal endothelium. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1987;28(12):1955–1962. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McCartney MD, Wood TO, McLaughlin BJ. Moderate Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy ATPase pump site density. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1989;30(7):1560–1564. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kopplin LJ, Przepyszny K, Schmotzer B, et al. Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy Genetics Multi-Center Study Group. Relationship of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy severity to central corneal thickness. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2012;130(4):433–439. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.1626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kayes J, Holmberg A. The fine structure of the cornea in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Invest. Ophthalmol. 1964;3:47–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sundin OH, Jun AS, Broman KW, et al. Linkage of late-onset Fuchs corneal dystrophy to a novel locus at 13pTel-13q12.13. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(1):140–145. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Describes the localization of the first FCD locus to chromosome 13.
- 25.Sundin OH, Broman KW, Chang HH, Vito EC, Stark WJ, Gottsch JD. A common locus for late-onset Fuchs corneal dystrophy maps to 18q21.2–q21.32. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(9):3919–3926. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Describes the localization of FCD2 to chromosome 18 in three families, providing the first evidence of a common FCD locus.
- 26.McGlumphy EJ, Yeo WS, Riazuddin SA, et al. Age-severity relationships in families linked to FCD2 with retroillumination photography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(12):6298–6302. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Riazuddin SA, Eghrari AO, Al-Saif A, et al. Linkage of a mild late-onset phenotype of Fuchs corneal dystrophy to a novel locus at 5q33.1–q35.2. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(12):5667–5671. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Riazuddin SA, Zaghloul NA, Al-Saif A, et al. Missense mutations in TCF8 cause late-onset Fuchs corneal dystrophy and interact with FCD4 on chromosome 9p. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010;86(1):45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Krafchak CM, Pawar H, Moroi SE, et al. Mutations in TCF8 cause posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy and ectopic expression of COL4A3 by corneal endothelial cells. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2005;77(5):694–708. doi: 10.1086/497348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Afshari NA, Li YJ, Pericak-Vance MA, Gregory S, Klintworth GK. Genomewide linkage scan in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(3):1093–1097. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-1839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li YJ, Minear MA, Rimmler J, et al. Replication of TCF4 through association and linkage studies in late-onset Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(4):e18044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mehta JS, Vithana EN, Tan DT, et al. Analysis of the posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 3 gene, TCF8, in late-onset Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(1):184–188. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vincent AL, Niederer RL, Richards A, Karolyi B, Patel DV, McGhee CN. Phenotypic characterisation and ZEB1 mutational analysis in posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy in a New Zealand population. Mol. Vis. 2009;15:2544–2553. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yellore VS, Rayner SA, Nguyen CK, et al. Analysis of the role of ZEB1 in the pathogenesis of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(1):273–278. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gottsch JD, Bowers AL, Margulies EH, et al. Serial analysis of gene expression in the corneal endothelium of Fuchs' dystrophy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(2):594–599. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Serial analysis of gene expression of FCD versus normal control corneas, providing insight into possible pathways involved in the pathogenesis of FCD.
- 36.Vithana EN, Morgan P, Sundaresan P, et al. Mutations in sodium-borate cotransporter SLC4A11 cause recessive congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED2) Nat. Genet. 2006;38(7):755–757. doi: 10.1038/ng1824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Desir J, Moya G, Reish O, et al. Borate transporter SLC4A11 mutations cause both Harboyan syndrome and non-syndromic corneal endothelial dystrophy. J. Med. Genet. 2007;44(5):322–326. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.046904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vithana EN, Morgan PE, Ramprasad V, et al. SLC4A11 mutations in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2008;17(5):656–666. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Identification of SLC4A11, the first known FCD gene.
- 39.Riazuddin SA, Vithana EN, Seet LF, et al. Missense mutations in the sodium borate cotransporter SLC4A11 cause late-onset Fuchs corneal dystrophy. Hum. Mutat. 2010;31(11):1261–1268. doi: 10.1002/humu.21356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liu J, Seet LF, Koh LW, et al. Depletion of SLC4A11 causes cell death by apoptosis in an immortalized human corneal endothelial cell line. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(7):3270–3279. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Riazuddin SA, Parker DS, McGlumphy EJ, et al. Mutations in LOXHD1, a recessive-deafness locus, cause dominant late-onset Fuchs corneal dystrophy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012;90(3):533–539. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Baratz KH, Tosakulwong N, Ryu E, et al. E2-2 protein and Fuchs's corneal dystrophy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;363(11):1016–1024. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1007064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Riazuddin SA, McGlumphy EJ, Yeo WS, Wang J, Katsanis N, Gottsch JD. Replication of the TCF4 intronic variant in late-onset Fuchs corneal dystrophy and evidence of independence from the FCD2 locus. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(5):2825–2829. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kuot A, Hewitt AW, Griggs K, et al. Association of TCF4 and CLU polymorphisms with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and implication of CLU and TGFBI proteins in the disease process. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2012;20(6):632–638. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Thalamuthu A, Khor CC, Venkataraman D, et al. Association of TCF4 gene polymorphisms with Fuchs' corneal dystrophy in the Chinese. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(8):5573–5578. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tung PS, Burdzy K, Wong K, Fritz IB. Competition between cell–substratum interactions and cell–cell interactions. J. Cell. Physiol. 1992;152(2):410–421. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041520224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jurkunas UV, Bitar MS, Rawe I, Harris DL, Colby K, Joyce NC. Increased clusterin expression in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(7):2946–2955. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hirano K, Klintworth GK, Zhan Q, Bennett K, Cintron C. β Ig-h3 is synthesized by corneal epithelium and perhaps endotheliumin Fuchs' dystrophic corneas. Curr. Eye Res. 1996;15(9):965–972. doi: 10.3109/02713689609017642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Munier FL, Korvatska E, Djemaï A, et al. Kerato-epithelin mutations in four 5q31-linked corneal dystrophies. Nat. Genet. 1997;15(3):247–251. doi: 10.1038/ng0397-247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jurkunas UV, Bitar M, Rawe I. Colocalization of increased transforming growth factor-β-induced protein (TGFBIp) and Clusterin in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(3):1129–1136. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Meadows DN, Eghrari AO, Riazuddin SA, Emmert DG, Katsanis N, Gottsch JD. Progression of Fuchs corneal dystrophy in a family linked to the FCD1 locus. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(12):5662–5666. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Biswas S, Munier FL, Yardley J, et al. Missense mutations in COL8A2, the gene encoding the α2 chain of type VIII collagen, cause two forms of corneal endothelial dystrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001;10(21):2415–2423. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.21.2415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kobayashi A, Fujiki K, Murakami A, et al. Analysis of COL8A2 gene mutation in Japanese patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and posterior polymorphous dystrophy. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2004;48(3):195–198. doi: 10.1007/s10384-003-0063-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mok JW, Kim HS, Joo CK. Q455V mutation in COL8A2 is associated with Fuchs' corneal dystrophy in Korean patients. Eye (Lond.) 2009;23(4):895–903. doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gottsch JD, Sundin OH, Liu SH, et al. Inheritance of a novel COL8A2 mutation defines a distinct early-onset subtype of Fuchs corneal dystrophy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(6):1934–1939. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Magovern M, Beauchamp GR, McTigue JW, Fine BS, Baumiller RC. Inheritance of Fuchs' combined dystrophy. Ophthalmology. 1979;86(10):1897–1923. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(79)35340-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Liskova P, Prescott Q, Bhattacharya SS, Tuft SJ. British family with early-onset Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy associated with p.L450W mutation in the COL8A2 gene. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007;91(12):1717–1718. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.115154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gottsch JD, Zhang C, Sundin OH, Bell WR, Stark WJ, Green WR. Fuchs corneal dystrophy: aberrant collagen distribution in an L450W mutant of the COL8A2 gene. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(12):4504–4511. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhang C, Bell WR, Sundin OH, et al. Immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy of early-onset Fuchs corneal dystrophy in three cases with the same L450W COL8A2 mutation. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 2006;104:85–97. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jun AS, Broman KW, Do DV, Akpek EK, Stark WJ, Gottsch JD. Endothelial dystrophy, iris hypoplasia, congenital cataract, and stromal thinning (EDICT) syndrome maps to chromosome 15q22.1–q25.3. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;134(2):172–176. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01401-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Akpek EK, Jun AS, Goodman DF, Green WR, Gottsch JD. Clinical and ultrastructural features of a novel hereditary anterior segment dysgenesis. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(3):513–519. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00975-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Iliff BW, Riazuddin SA, Gottsch JD. A single-base substitution in the seed region of miR-184 causes EDICT syndrome. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(1):348–353. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lee MM, Ritter R, 3rd, Hirose T, Vu CD, Edwards AO. Snowflake vitreoretinal degeneration: follow-up of the original family. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(12):2418–2426. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00828-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hejtmancik JF, Jiao X, Li A, et al. Mutations in KCNJ13 cause autosomal-dominant snowflake vitreoretinal degeneration. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2008;82(1):174–180. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Nemoto S. Family cases of Harboyan syndrome. Jibiinkoka. 1986;58:161–165. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Magli A, Capasso L, Foà T, Maurino V, Ventruto V. A further observation of corneal dystrophy and perceptive deafness in two siblings. Ophthalmic Genet. 1997;18(2):87–91. doi: 10.3109/13816819709057120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Puga AC, Nogueira AH, Félix TM, Kwitko S. Congenital corneal dystrophy and progressive sensorineural hearing loss (Harboyan syndrome) Am. J. Med. Genet. 1998;80(2):177–179. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19981102)80:2<177::aid-ajmg17>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Abramowicz MJ, Albuquerque-Silva J, Zanen A. Corneal dystrophy and perceptive deafness (Harboyan syndrome): CDPD1 maps to 20p13. J. Med. Genet. 2002;39(2):110–112. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.2.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Park M, Li Q, Shcheynikov N, Zeng W, Muallem S. NaBC1 is a ubiquitous electrogenic Na+-coupled borate transporter essential for cellular boron homeostasis and cell growth and proliferation. Mol. Cell. 2004;16(3):331–341. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bibas A, Liang J, Michaels L, Wright A. The development of the stria vascularis in the human foetus. Clin. Otolaryngol. Allied Sci. 2000;25(2):126–129. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2000.00340.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Creuzet S, Vincent C, Couly G. Neural crest derivatives in ocular and periocular structures. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2005;49(2–3):161–171. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.041937sc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Morris KA, Snir E, Pompeia C, et al. Differential expression of genes within the cochlea as defined by a custom mouse inner ear microarray. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2005;6(1):75–89. doi: 10.1007/s10162-004-5046-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Trune DR. Ion homeostasis in the ear: mechanisms, maladies, and management. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2010;18(5):413–419. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32833d9597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wangemann P. Supporting sensory transduction: cochlear fluid homeostasis and the endocochlear potential. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 2006;576(Pt 1):11–21. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.112888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Lopez IA, Rosenblatt MI, Kim C, et al. Slc4a11 gene disruption in mice: cellular targets of sensorineuronal abnormalities. J Biol. Chem. 2009;284(39):26882–26896. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.008102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Grillet N, Schwander M, Hildebrand MS, et al. Mutations in LOXHD1, an evolutionarily conserved stereociliary protein, disrupt hair cell function in mice and cause progressive hearing loss in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009;85(3):328–337. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Edvardson S, Jalas C, Shaag A, et al. A deleterious mutation in the LOXHD1 gene causes autosomal recessive hearing loss in Ashkenazi Jews. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2011;155A(5):1170–1172. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Albin RL. Fuchs corneal dystrophy in a patient with mitochondrial DNA mutations. J. Med. Genet. 1998;35(3):258–259. doi: 10.1136/jmg.35.3.258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Stehouwer M, Bijlsma WR, Van der Lelij A. Hearing disability in patients with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy: unrecognized co-pathology? Clin. Ophthalmol. 2011;5:1297–1301. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S23091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.McGowan SL, Edelhauser HF, Pfister RR, Whikehart DR. Stem cell markers in the human posterior limbus and corneal endothelium of unwounded and wounded corneas. Mol. Vis. 2007;13:1984–2000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Eger A, Aigner K, Sonderegger S, et al. EF1 is a transcriptional repressor of E-cadherin and regulates epithelial plasticity in breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2005;24(14):2375–2385. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Sobrado VR, Moreno-Bueno G, Cubillo E, et al. The class I bHLH factors E2-2A and E2-2B regulate EMT. J. Cell. Sci. 2009;122(Pt 7):1014–1024. doi: 10.1242/jcs.028241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ma C, Rong Y, Radiloff DR, et al. Extracellular matrix protein βig-h3/TGFBI promotes metastasis of colon cancer by enhancing cell extravasation. Genes Dev. 2008;22(3):308–321. doi: 10.1101/gad.1632008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Chou TY, Chen WC, Lee AC, Hung SM, Shih NY, Chen MY. Clusterin silencing in human lung adenocarcinoma cells induces a mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition through modulating the ERK/Slug pathway. Cell. Signal. 2009;21(5):704–711. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Giese A, Bjerkvig R, Berens ME, Westphal M. Cost of migration: invasion of malignant gliomas and implications for treatment. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003;21(8):1624–1636. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.05.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Grille SJ, Bellacosa A, Upson J, et al. The protein kinase Akt induces epithelial–mesenchymal transition and promotes enhanced motility and invasiveness of squamous cell carcinoma lines. Cancer Res. 2003;63(9):2172–2178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Gupta A, Dey CS. PTEN and SHIP2 regulates PI3K/Akt pathway through focal adhesion kinase. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2009;309(1–2):55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2009.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Yu J, Peng H, Ruan Q, Fatima A, Getsios S, Lavker RM. MicroRNA-205 promotes keratinocyte migration via the lipid phosphatase SHIP2. FASEB J. 2010;24(10):3950–3959. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-157404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Gregory PA, Bert AG, Paterson EL, et al. The miR-200 family and miR-205 regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SIP1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008;10(5):593–601. doi: 10.1038/ncb1722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Korpal M, Lee ES, Hu G, Kang Y. The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial–mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283(22):14910–14914. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C800074200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Borderie VM, Baudrimont M, Vallée A, Ereau TL, Gray F, Laroche L. Corneal endothelial cell apoptosis in patients with Fuchs' dystrophy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000;41(9):2501–2505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Li QJ, Ashraf MF, Shen DF, et al. The role of apoptosis in the pathogenesis of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy of the cornea. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2001;119(11):1597–1604. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.11.1597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Wang Z, Handa JT, Green WR, Stark WJ, Weinberg RS, Jun AS. Advanced glycation end products and receptors in Fuchs' dystrophy corneas undergoing Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(8):1453–1460. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Buddi R, Lin B, Atilano SR, Zorapapel NC, Kenney MC, Brown DJ. Evidence of oxidative stress in human corneal diseases. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2002;50(3):341–351. doi: 10.1177/002215540205000306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Jurkunas UV, Bitar MS, Funaki T, Azizi B. Evidence of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Am. J. Pathol. 2010;177(5):2278–2289. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Molecular biology approach investigating the role of oxidative stress in FCD.
- 96.Cadenas E, Davies KJ. Mitochondrial free radical generation, oxidative stress, and aging. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2000;29(3–4):222–230. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(00)00317-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Dikstein S, Maurice DM. The metabolic basis to the fluid pump in the cornea. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 1972;221(1):29–41. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Jurkunas UV, Rawe I, Bitar MS, et al. Decreased expression of peroxiredoxins in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(7):2956–2963. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Azizi B, Ziaei A, Fuchsluger T, Schmedt T, Chen Y, Jurkunas UV. p53-regulated increase in oxidative-stress–induced apoptosis in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: a native tissue model. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(13):9291–9297. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Engler C, Kelliher C, Spitze AR, Speck CL, Eberhart CG, Jun AS. Unfolded protein response in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: a unifying pathogenic pathway? Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2010;149(2):194.e2–202.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Proposal of unfolded protein response as a pathogenic pathway in FCD.
- 101.Eghrari AO, Gottsch JD. Fuchs' corneal dystrophy. Expert Rev. Ophthalmol. 2010;5(2):147–159. doi: 10.1586/eop.10.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Broad review of FCD, including an in-depth historical perspective and discussion of epidemiology, clinical treatment and corneal imaging.
