Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 10.
Published in final edited form as: AJS. 2011 Jul;117(1):172–208. doi: 10.1086/661079

Appendix Table A4.

Odds Ratios from Logistic Regression Models Predicting Anorgasmia (N=670)a

Predictor Model 1 Model 2b Model 3c Model 4b,c
Partner betweenness 1.515 (.366) 1.678* (.410) 1.539 (.362) 1.780* (.453)
Proportion kin .548 (.187) .635 (.217) .533 (.171) .605 (.205)
Proportion female 1.602 (.623) 1.514 (.622) 1.642 (.648) 1.574 (.671)
Age (ref: 5764):
6574 2.203** (.594) 2.221** (.632) 2.070** (.545) 2.057* (.576)
7585 3.736*** (1.017) 3.168*** (.917) 3.460*** (1.034) 3.060** (.996)
Retired .994 (.264) .994 (.272) .857 (.250) .865 (.264)
Married to partner -- .454* (.149) -- .435* (.150)
Frequency of sex (ref: monthly or less):
23 times a month -- .346*** (.093) -- .342** (.102)
12 times a week -- .260*** (.070) -- .288*** (.082)
> 2 times a week -- .474 (.202) -- .488 (.222)
Partner satisfaction -- 1.094 (.159) -- 1.131 (.168)
Partner demanding -- 1.014 (.419) -- 1.085 (.406)
Prostate trouble -- -- 1.910** (.378) 1.869** (.373)
Diabetes -- -- 1.292 (.436) 1.260 (.440)
Self-rated health (ref: excellent)
Poor/Fair -- -- 1.873 (.945) 1.551 (.849)
Good -- -- 1.512 (.733) 1.452 (.715)
Very good -- -- 1.328 (.581) 1.185 (.513)
F (d.f.) 4.07*** (9,42) 5.03*** (16,35) 5.87*** (24,27) 5.98*** (31,20)
Fleiss, Williams, Dubro R2 .041 .077 .084 .109
*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001 (two-tailed tests)

a

Estimates are weighted to adjust for probability of inclusion in the analysis and differential non-response. All models are survey-adjusted, and control for network size, education, and whether R is out of the labor force.

b

Includes control for amount of time spent with partner.

c

Controls for obesity, cardiovascular problems, cancer, CES-D-ml, functional health, SPMSQ, use of medications, and rating of partner's health.