Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2012 Nov 20;53(2):166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.10.004

Table 3.

Results for Intervention Effects

Outcome B SE Effect size
Sibling relationship
Fair play (M) 0.15* 0.06 0.34
Fair play (F) 0.03 0.08 ---
Sibling intimacy (C) 0.07 0.09 ---
Sibling conflict (C) 0.13 0.08 ---
Sibling negativity (O) 0.01 0.10 ---
Sibling positivity (O) 0.28* 0.13 0.32
Rule break approval (O)a 0.41 0.82 ---

Child adjustment
Externalizing (M) −0.59 0.41 ---
Externalizing (F) 0.01 0.59 ---
Internalizing (M) −0.55* 0.22 0.31
Internalizing (F) −0.32 0.33 ---
Self-control (M) 0.12* 0.06 0.24
Self-control (F) 0.14* 0.07 0.29
Social competence (T) 0.22** 0.08 0.32
Academic performance (T) 0.08* 0.04 0.24

Parenting
Authoritarian control (M) −0.07 0.09 ---
Authoritarian control (F) −0.15 0.11 ---
Positive guidance (M) 0.07 0.09 ---
Positive guidance (F) −0.10 0.09 ---
Noninvolvement (M) 0.19* 0.09 0.27
Noninvolvement (F) 0.19* 0.09 0.29
Depressive symptoms (M) −0.10** 0.03 0.23
Depressive symptoms (F) −0.03 0.04 ---

Note. (M) = mother-reported; (F) = father-reported; (T) = teacher-reported; (C) = child-reported; (O) = observed.

a

Log-odds coefficient from multi-level logistic regression.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.