Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr;79(8):2777–2788. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03110-12

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Effect of the ΔcryD mutation on conidiation. (A) Numbers of conidia produced by the wild type and the ΔcryD mutants SF236 and SF237 grown for 7 days under white light (7 W m−2) in DGasn and DGasn low-N medium (“High N” and “Low N” on the graph, respectively). The data show averages and standard deviations from six biological replicates. (B) Conidium samples from representative examples of the data shown above. The pictures were taken under a microscope at 400×.