Table 3.
Outcome Results
| ETT | HTT | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| total | ETT | HTT | CM | CMS | CM | CMS | |
| N=146 | N=50 | N=96 | N=25 | N=25 | N=48 | N=48 | |
| Cluster Outcomes | |||||||
| Stable success1 | 66 | 38 (76%)) | 28 (29%) | 21 (84%) | 17 (68%) | 13 (27%) | 15 (31%) |
| Improving | 9 | 2 (4%) | 7 (7%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (8%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (15%) |
| Deteriorating | 19 | 5 (10%) | 14 (15%) | 2 (8%) | 3 (12%) | 7 (15%) | 7 (15%) |
| Poor Outcomes | 52 | 5 (10%) | 47 (49%) | 2 (8%) | 3 (12%) | 28 (58%) | 19 (40%) |
| Non-Cluster Outcomes | |||||||
| 32 | 30 | 17 | 15 | 11 | 19 | ||
| CO < 4 Visits 66–701 | (42%) | (64%)* | (31%) | (68%) | (60%) | (23%) | (40%) |
| 30.5 | 61 | 10.5 | 61 | 61 | 3.5 | 21 | |
| Visits CO <4 ppm2 | (2–57) | (43–67)* | (0–43.5) | (51–67) | (28–67) | (0–42) | (1–47) |
1
N (Percent of sample)
2
median (inter-quartile range)
*
P<0.05, Fisher’s Exact or Median Test; ETT=Easier to Treat; HTT=Harder to Treat;
CM=Contingency Management without Shaping;
CMS=Contingency Management with Shaping