Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr;57(4):1756–1762. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01232-12

Table 2.

Clinical response at test of cure in the clinically evaluable (primary-outcome), clinical modified intention to treat (secondary-outcome), and microbiologically evaluable (secondary-outcome) populationsa

Parameter Tigecycline (75 mg) Tigecycline (100 mg) Imipenem/cilastatin
CE population
    Subjects, n 23 20 24
    Cure, n (%) 16 (69.6) 17 (85.0) 18 (75.0)
    Differenceb (70% CI) −5.4 (−21.6, 10.9) 10.0 (−6.1, 24.8) N/A
c-mITT population
    Subjects, n 36 35 34
    Cure, n (%) 19 (52.8) 25 (71.4) 18 (52.9)
    Differenceb (70% CI) −0.2 (−14.3, 14.0) 18.5 (4.3, 31.8) N/A
ME population
    Subjects, n 13 10 15
    Cure, n (%) 9 (69.2) 8 (80.0) 12 (80.0)
    Differenceb (70% CI) −10.8 (−32.0, 10.9) 0.0 (−23.8, 20.9) N/A
a

CE, clinically evaluable; CI, confidence interval; c-mITT, clinical modified intention to treat; ME, microbiologically evaluable; N/A, not applicable.

b

Tigecycline versus imipenem/cilastatin.