Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr;57(4):1797–1803. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02142-12

Table 3.

Characteristics and trends in antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at University Hospital Tübingen (January 2002 to December 2011)

Antimicrobial resistance phenotype Resistance (%)a Gradient (95% CI)b Trend P value ARIMAc BICd MSEe
Gentamicin 13.95 (11.25–20.2) 0.18 (−0.45 to 0.08) Stable 0.17 1,0,0 287.79 59.35
Tobramycin 5.05 (3.45–6.65) 0.15 (0.08 to 0.23) Increasing <0.001 1+4,0,0 191.93 4.95
Piperacillin 9.4 (6.85–17.85) 0.09 (−0.16 to 0.34) Stable 0.49 1,0,0 283.17 52.96
Piperacillin-tazobactam 7.2 (4.35–14.2) 0.09 (−0.13 to 0.32) Stable 0.41 1,0,0 274.11 42.25
Levofloxacin 25.35 (19.6–31.25) 0.44 (0.29 to 0.58) Increasing <0.001 0,1,1 249.69 27.1
Ciprofloxacin 21.9 (17.6–24) 0.28 (0.15 to 0.42) Increasing <0.001 1,0,0 257.73 27.91
Meropenem 10.75 (8.15–14.4) 0.16 (0.06 to 0.25) Increasing 0.001 1,0,0 223.32 11.81
Ceftazidime 11.7 (9.3–15.05) 0.18 (0.09 to 0.26) Increasing <0.001 1,0,0 217.66 10.25
Cefepime 9.9 (6.15–13.45) 0.25 (0.15 to 0.35) Increasing <0.001 1,0,0 232.43 14.86
a

Resistance is shown as a percentage of resistant isolates per quarter. The median value is shown. The interquartile range is shown in parentheses.

b

The gradient is shown as a percent change in resistance per quarter. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI) is shown in parentheses.

c

ARIMA, autoregressive integrated moving average.

d

BIC, Bayesian information criterion.

e

MSE, mean squared error.