Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Biol Dyn. 2011 Jun 27;6(0 1):54–71. doi: 10.1080/17513758.2011.590610

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Oscillatory dynamics generated from the Turing instability for the go-or-grow model. Spatio-temporal evolution of (a) motile and (b) static populations. The horizontal axis is used for space and the vertical one for time. Both curves correspond to the long-time evolution of the simulations presented in Figures 3(b) and (c). (a) The dashed lines represent the contour level ρ1=ρ1, the value of the initial uniform steady-state (ρ1=0.31 for the simulation). These contour levels suggest an almost spatially uniform distribution of motile cells that increases after the initial instability depicted in Figure 3(b) and (c) until a threshold (reached at t ≃ 140), where motile cells become static (i.e. ρ1 decreases by feeding the static population). This corresponds to the development of a new instability of the static population, which later stabilizes and feeds again the motile population, thus increasing again until similar dynamics are repeated at t ≃ 500. (b) The dotted and dashed lines represent the contour levels ρ2 = 0.01 and ρ2 = 0.1, respectively. They suggest that low values of the static population correspond to almost uniform distributions (i.e. ρ2(x, t) ≃ ρ2(t)). When the immotile population increases enough due to an influx from the motile population (at times t ≃ 140 and t ≃ 500), an instability occurs and briefly leads to a non-uniform distribution of immotile aggregates. The latter disappear shortly by releasing cells into the motile population due to the lack of density until the process repeats.