Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Biol Dyn. 2011 Jun 27;6(0 1):54–71. doi: 10.1080/17513758.2011.590610

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Types of travelling wave solutions for the go-or-grow model under mechanism M1. (Top) Parameter regions of (M, ρ*)-plane corresponding to different behaviours of the solutions ρ1 and ρ2 (for a fixed value of the sharpness parameter (α = 4)). Region 3 is defined as unstable to diffusion-driven processes (i.e. condition (12) is satisfied) and corresponds to simple travelling wave solutions. The dotted line that separates regions 1 and 2 is the result of numerical investigation. In region 2, solutions are characterized by an oscillatory profile of the moving front, where peaks of immotile cells form and remain as fixed patterns after the front went past. In region 3, the solutions degenerate behind the moving front into irregular spatio-temporal oscillations with no apparent order. (Bottom) Snapshots at time t ≃ 377 of the density profiles of the motile (ρ1 – red line) and static (ρ2 – green line) populations corresponding to the points Pi in the top graph. The value of M is kept fixed while ρ* is increased from left to right, which corresponds to the vertical path between P1 and P3 in the top graph. (Left) Simple travelling wave solutions – P1 = (1.6, 0.57) in region 1. Note the small peak of the static population at the edge of the front. (Centre) Oscillatory moving front – P2 = (1.6, 0.6)) in region 2. The oscillatory nature of the peak results in the formation of stationary patterns of immotile cells behind the moving front. (Right) Irregular spatio-temporal oscillations behind the moving front – P3 = (1.6, 0.75) in region 3.