Table 3.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis Inuit women with depleted iron stores as the dependent variable1-2
| Multivariate odds ratio3 | 95% Confidence interval for OR | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Postmenopausal (1 = yes, 0 = no) |
0.120 |
0.069 – 0.207 |
<0.001 |
| % Body fat > cut-off(1 = yes, 0 = no) |
0.414 |
0.297 – 0.578 |
<0.001 |
| hs-CRP2 (1 = 3-10 mg/L, 0 = <3 mg/L) |
0.571 |
0.369 – 0.884 |
0.012 |
| RBC LC-PUFA,% of total fatty acids |
0.896 |
0.793 – 1.012 |
0.068 |
| Oral contraceptive use (1 = yes, 0 = no) |
0.426 |
0.262 – 0.693 |
0.078 |
| Food insecure (1 = yes, 0 = no) |
1.37 |
0.98 – 1.92 |
0.001 |
| Food insecure* RBC LC-PUFA | 0.842 | 0.721 – 0.984 | 0.030 |
1 Women with hs-CRP > 10 mg/L and women with elevated iron stores were excluded from the model (n = 1062 in final model).
2 For highly prevalent outcomes, the odds ratios will tend to exaggerate the true relative risk.
3All variables presented were evaluated together in one model. The within-dwelling variance component was 0.1.