Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 26;2:9. doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-2-9

Table 5.

Attitudes towards the implementation of a measurement system of infections in ICUs

 
Weighted estimates for Europe (respondents from 16 countries with >=10 replies)
Other respondants (66 countries)
 
N=1281
N=449
 
Agree strongly/ agree
Disagree/ disagree strongly
Agree strongly/ agree
Disagree/ disagree strongly
  % 95% CI % 95% CI % 95% CI % 95% CI        
To what extent do you agree with the following comments
If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it
83
80
85
11
9
13
84
80
87
11
8
14
Monitoring of VAP related measures stimulates quality improvement
93
91
94
2
1
3
97
94
98
1
0
3
VAP-related measures in my ICU (if any) are reliable
54
51
58
12
10
15
66
61
70
8
6
11
I am willing to implement, or support, a VAP data collection system
84
81
86
4
3
6
92
89
94
1
0
3
Clinical diagnosis of VAP is difficult: this makes measurement systems unreliable
46
43
50
32
29
36
43
38
47
36
32
41
There is a difference between a definition of VAP for reporting, and a diagnosis of VAP for treatment
45
42
49
32
28
35
46
41
50
30
26
35
Please indicate what actions would facilitate the implementation of a measurement system of infections in ICUs
Timely feed-back of data at ICU level
92
90
94
1
1
2
96
93
97
0
0
2
Administrative support
88
86
90
2
1
3
95
92
97
1
0
2
Dedicated software / IT resources
91
89
93
2
1
3
92
89
94
0
0
2
Reliable data 95 93 96 1 0 2 96 94 98 0 0 1