Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 16;11:70. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-70

Table 4.

Evolution of quality indicators as formulated by EUSOMA prospectively evaluated between 2003 and 2010 (data for first semester)

Outcome measure     2003   2010   P value
 
EUSOMA
   
 
 
 
 
 
Minimum standard
Target
N
%
N
%
 
Positive preoperative cyto/histological diagnosis
 
 
77/130
59.7%
161/183
88.4%
0.0001
 
80%
90%
 
 
 
 
 
Operated invasive carcinoma for which hist. type, grading ER/PR, stage and size were recorded
 
 
106/112
94.6%
178/181
98.3%
0.1467
 
90%
95%
 
 
 
 
 
Operated non invasive carcinoma for which size, histological type and grading are recorded
 
 
5/7
71%
28/29
96.5%
0.4966
 
95%
98%
 
 
 
 
 
More than 9 lymph nodes removed when ALD performed (excluding sampling)
 
 
97/112
85.6%
67/70
95.7%
0.0434
 
95%
98%
 
 
 
 
 
Postoperative radiotherapy in M0 invasive CA with BCT
 
 
50/51
98%
105/108
97.2%
0.7588
 
90%
95%
 
 
 
 
 
BCT in invasive carcinoma with total size up to 30 mm (including DCIS component)
 
 
49/79
62%
86/104
82.6%
0.0016
 
70%
80%
 
 
 
 
 
BCT in carcinoma in situ up to 20 mm
 
 
3/7
43.8%
11/14
78.6
0.0016
 
70%
80%
 
 
 
 
 
Ductal carcinoma in situ without axillary dissection
 
 
6/7
85.7%
22/23
95.6%
0.3560
 
80%
90%
 
 
 
 
 
Hormonotherapy in endocrine sensitive invasive carcinoma
 
 
89/105
84.8%
151/155
97.4%
0.0002
 
80%
90%
 
 
 
 
 
Adjuvant chemotherapy in ER- (PT1c+ or N+) invasive Carcinoma
 
 
18/25
72%
22/23
95.6%
0.0280
  80% 90%          

N: number of patients; %: percentage of successful outcome measure/total number of cases; ER: estrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor; ALD: axillary lymph node dissection; BCT: breast conserving therapy; DCIS: ductal carcinoma in situ; significance level calculated with two-tailed χ2 test without Yates correction.