Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ther Drug Monit. 2013 Apr;35(2):194–202. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31827e18d2

Table 3. Percentage of Participants Meeting Metabolic syndrome Criteria as Reported by Particular Treatment.

Table 3 outlines under each column heading, the number (and percentage) of participants receiving the various treatments as listed in column 1. Five columns are represented in this table. The first column lists the various treatment measures investigated in the study. The second, third and fourth columns list the number of participants receiving each respective treatment that 1) don’t meet criteria for metabolic syndrome, do meet criteria for metabolic syndrome, and 3) are receiving the particular treatment. The fifth column lists the percentage of participants receiving the particular treatment who meet criteria for metabolic syndrome. This is calculated by a ratio of column three/column four.

Psychopharmacological Treatment No Metabolic syndrome (N=73) Metabolic syndrome (N=26) Total Study Subjects (N=99) % of Subjects who Meet Metabolic syndrome Criteria
AAP 30 16 46 35 %
Olanzepine 2 4 6 67 %
Quetiapine 19 8 27 30 %
Risperidone 5 3 8 38 %
Paliperidone 2 2 4 50 %
Clozapine 3 0 3 0 %
Monotherapy (i.e. one medication) 37 11 48 23 %
Antipsychotics and Mood Stabilizers 32 13 45 29 %
Mood Stabilizer 54 17 71 24 %