Patient selection and sample size |
• Exclude seronegative patients |
• Define the disease activity using a validated disease activity
index |
• Define refractory disease as either failure to respond to one or
more immunosuppressants and an assigned dose of corticosteroids |
• Ensure adequate sample size based on statistical power calculation
to allow detection of even small therapeutic effects |
• Allow for proportional representation of patients taking into
account factors such as race, age, the duration of disease and type of organ
involvement. For example, different histological types of nephritis may have
variable sensitivity to B-cell depletion therapy |
B-cell depletion |
• Standardise the definition of adequate degree of B-cell depletion;
for example, <5 cells/μl |
The treatment protocol and the rituximab regimen |
• A randomised trial of adequate sample size to distinguish whether
the two-dose or four-dose regimen ± cyclophosphamide is effective at
achieving an effective B-cell depletion and a favourable clinical
response |
• Determine an appropriate time to retreat |
• Using a standard rituximab regimen would allow for a better
comparison between trials |
Standardising concomitant therapy |
• Classify a change in concomitant immunosuppressant therapy >25%
above baseline as partial failure and >50% as complete failure |
• Define an increase in the dose of prednisolone >7.5 mg as partial
failure and >30 mg as complete failure |
Choosing the right disease activity index |
• Choosing an index that is validated and is able to capture
organ-specific changes: SLE Responder Index and British Isles Lupus
Assessment Group, respectively |
Defining the endpoints |
• Define practically achievable primary endpoints, based on a pilot
study and/or taking into account the predicted failure rate for the define
cohort, which would detect even small therapeutic benefit |
• Define both clinical and nonclinical parameters in the secondary
endpoints |
• Assess steroid-sparing effect. For example, allow only low-dose
prednisolone <10 mg/day and any clinical requirement to increase the dose
by >50% as partial failure and >100% as complete failure |
Duration of follow-up |
• The duration of follow-up should be defined to allow capture of both
early and late effects including both safety and efficacy of the therapeutic
intervention. |
• Defining the adverse events |
The reporting of adverse events could be standardised adhering to the
OMERACT-recommended guidance [63] |