TABLE 1.

Analysis of significant change in internalization relative to WT (two-way ANOVA, post hoc Bonferroni)

Results of each data set were analyzed separately (Fig. 8, A–E) and are presented together. For each data set, interaction p < 0.05, receptor p < 0.05, and time <0.05. +, p < 0.05; −, p > 0.05; NT, not tested.

Receptor	Time
	3.75	7.5	15	30	120
	min	min	min	min	min
+K44A	−	+	+	+	+
WT/V2R tail	+	+	+	+	+
834	+	+	+	+	+
839	NT	+	+	+	+
844	NT	+	+	+	+
849	NT	+	+	+	+
854	NT	+	+	+	−
859	NT	+	+	+	−
864	NT	−	−	−	−
869	NT	+	−	−	−
874	NT	−	−	−	−
902	NT	+	−	−	−
pDel 833–907	NT	+	+	+	+
pDel 833–865	NT	+	+	+	+
pDel 866–907	NT	−	−	−	−
pDel 844–864	NT	+	+	+	+
+A844S	NT	+	+	+	+
+A848S	NT	+	+	+	+
+A851S	NT	+	+	+	+
+A854S	NT	+	+	+	+
+A861S/A864S	NT	−	−	−	−
A861S/A864S	NT	+	+	−	−