Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 21;29(8):1035–1043. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt087

Table 1.

Isoform simulation results

Methods Power (%) FDR (%)
Cuffdiff2 33.6 0.2
Cuffdiff2(OK) 44.4 0.2
EBSeq 72.2 8.2

The empirical power and FDR for EBSeq and Cuffdiff2 averaged across 100 Sim I simulations where target FDR was set at 5%. Cuffdiff2 deems some isoforms unacceptable prior to analysis. Operating characteristics are reported overall, as well as within those deemed acceptable (‘OK’) by Cuffdiff2. Standard errors on average power (FDR) were <2% (0.2%) and are not shown.