Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 21;29(8):1035–1043. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt087

Table 2.

Gene simulation results

Methods Power (%) FDR (%)
baySeq 60.8 0.4
DESeq 73.4 0
edgeR 73.1 4.6
EBSeq 78.8 2.7

The empirical power and FDR of baySeq, DESeq, edgeR and EBSeq averaged across 100 Sim III simulations where target FDR was set at 5%. Standard errors on average power (FDR) were <2.5% (1.4%) and are not shown.