Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 21;591(Pt 7):1967–1985. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.236604

Table 2.

Two-way ANOVA results for CT and GL nerve responses to taste compounds (T1R1−/− vs. T1R1+/− mice)

CT nerve GL nerve


Tastant Degrees of freedom F value Degrees of freedom F value
MSG 1,84 35.5*** 1,95 0.2
Interaction 4,84 6.9*** 4,95 0.1
MSG + IMP 1,81 134.5*** 1,95 0.0
Interaction 4,81 0.0 4,95 0.2
MPG 1,100 15.2*** 1,72 0.0
Interaction 4,100 7.0*** 4,72 0.4
MPG + IMP 1,81 61.6*** 1,59 1.1
Interaction 4,81 0.2 4,59 0.2
IMP 1,56 6.6* 1,48 0.0
Interaction 4,56 1.8 4,48 0.0
NaCl 1,71 0.3 1,66 0.2
Interaction 4,71 0.1 4,66 0.1
KCl 1,71 0.1 1,47 0.0
Interaction 4,71 0.2 4,47 0.0
HCl 1,82 0.2 1,79 0.2
Interaction 4,82 0.0 4,79 0.2
Sucrose 1,80 23.8*** 1,93 0.1
Interaction 5,80 2.9* 5,93 0.0
SC45647 1,59 8.8** 1,54 0.0
Interaction 3,59 0.2 3,54 0.0
Acesulfame K 1,50 7.2* 1,98 0.0
Interaction 4,50 0.6 4,98 0.1
QHCl 1,97 0.6 1,85 0.0
Interaction 6,97 0.1 6,85 0.1
QSO4 1,66 0.4 1,55 0.0
Interaction 3,66 0.1 3,55 0.0
Denatonium 1,63 0.5 1,48 0.0
Interaction 3,63 0.4 3,48 0.1

The effects of genotype were analysed by two-way ANOVA. The table is based on data shown in Figs 14. Top numbers for each chemical relate to the main effect (genotype) and bottom numbers to the interaction effect (genotype × concentration). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ANOVA. Abbreviations: CT, chorda tympani; GL, glossopharyngeal; IMP, inosine monophosphate; MPG, monopotassium glutamate; MSG, monosodium glutamate; QHCl, quinine hydrocholoride; and QSO4, quinine sulfate.