Table 1.
Effect of CLA and calcium supplementation on tibial bone parameters1
Bone parameters | OVX | OVX | OVX | OVX | Sham | Sham | p-value2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
0.5% Ca | 0.5% Ca | 1.0% Ca | 1.0% Ca | 1.0% Ca | 1.0% Ca | |||||
| ||||||||||
- | +CLA | - | +CLA | - | +CLA | Pooled SEM | Calcium | CLA | Interaction | |
ROI3 10% | ||||||||||
Total bone content*, mg/mm | 1.69c | 1.68c | 1.67c | 1.79c | 2.02b | 2.32a | 0.06 | NS3 | NS | NS |
Total bone density, mg/mm3 | 397d | 410cd | 416cd | 437c | 522b | 567a | 12.8 | 0.011 | 0.049 | NS |
Cortical bone content, mg/mm | 1.26d | 1.28d | 1.31cd | 1.43c | 1.66b | 1.86a | 0.05 | NS | NS | NS |
Cortical bone density, mg/mm3 | 803bc | 801c | 828bc | 838b | 896a | 906a | 13.0 | 0.004 | NS | NS |
Cortical bone attenuation, cm−1 | 1.21bc | 1.21c | 1.24bc | 1.25b | 1.32a | 1.34a | 0.02 | 0.004 | NS | NS |
Cortical thickness, mm | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.05 | NS | NS | NS |
Periosteal circumference, mm | 7.53a | 7.37ab | 7.22ab | 7.43a | 7.04b | 7.41a | 0.12 | NS | NS | NS |
SSI polar4 | 0.34b | 0.32b | 0.33b | 0.35b | 0.38a | 0.41a | 0.01 | NS | NS | NS (0.07) |
| ||||||||||
ROI 50% | ||||||||||
Total bone content, mg/mm | 1.40c | 1.45c | 1.45c | 1.59b | 1.57b | 1.71a | 0.03 | 0.008 | 0.008 | NS |
Total bone density, mg/mm3 | 762c | 763c | 774c | 815b | 863a | 834ab | 11.7 | 0.011 | NS (0.08) | NS (0.09) |
Cortical bone content, mg/mm | 1.29d | 1.36cd | 1.33d | 1.44bc | 1.46b | 1.59a | 0.03 | NS (0.08) | 0.014 | NS |
Cortical bone density, mg/mm3 | 1207c | 1206c | 1207c | 1219bc | 1237ab | 1241a | 7.00 | NS | NS | NS |
Cortical bone attenuation, cm−1 | 1.70c | 1.70c | 1.70c | 1.71bc | 1.74ab | 1.74a | 0.01 | NS | NS | NS |
Cortical thickness, mm | 0.27c | 0.29bc | 0.28c | 0.30b | 0.32a | 0.33a | 0.01 | NS | 0.014 | NS |
Periosteal circumference, mm | 4.58 | 4.65 | 4.18 | 4.69 | 4.47 | 4.57 | 0.19 | NS | NS | NS |
SSI polar | 0.17bc | 0.18bc | 0.17c | 0.18b | 0.18bc | 0.20a | 0.01 | NS | 0.035 | NS |
Means with different superscripts at each variable indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 (n = 11), analysed by one-way ANOVA.
p-values from 2-way ANOVA are from ovariectomised groups only.
ROI, Region of Interest; NS, Not significant.
Polar moment of inertia of the total bone area. Initial scout scans were utilised at a scan speed of 30 mm/sec to identify the total bone length and distal end plate of the tibia. Subsequently, high-density scans of the tibia (single axial slices of 0.5 mm thickness, voxel size 0.1 mm, measured diameter 90 mm) were taken at a translation speed of 10 mm/s at 10% and 50% of the approximated segment length proximal to the subchondral endplate of the distal tibia. For image analyses and calculation of the various bone indices, the manufacturer’s software package (version 6.0B) was used. A threshold algorithm (contour mode 31) was used to separate bone from the soft tissue background using a <169 mg/cm3 threshold. Cortical bone properties were assessed at both the 10% and 50% sites using a threshold of 800 mg/cm3.