Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 27;2013:528158. doi: 10.1155/2013/528158

Table 2.

Studies reporting the use of reinforcing cerclage.

Study Design Sample Size Average cervical length at diagnosis (mm) Cerclage type Mean gestational age (weeks) initial cerclage Mean
gestational age (weeks) additional cerclage
Total number
sutures
placed
Mean latency to delivery (weeks) Mean gestational age (weeks) at delivery Outcome Overall rate of PTB
Fox et al., 1998 [15] Prospective cohort 12/26 n/a McDonald 14* 20 (18–24) 2–4 13 (4–19) 34 (22–39) PTB < 37 wga
LB
75% (<37)
Baxter et al., 2005 [14] Retrospective cohort 5/24 14.3 ± 3.6 McDonald 124/7 191/7 2 14/7 20.8 ± 2.7 PTB < 35 wga
PTB < 24 wga
100% (<35)
80% (<24)
Simcox and Shennan, 2012 [16] Retrospective cohort 13/25 7.2 (0–15) McDonald 145/7 193/7 2 64/7 260/7 ± 5 1/7 PTB < 32 wga
PTB < 24 wga
92% (<32)
38% (<24)
Song et al., 2011 [17] Retrospective cohort 11/22 n/a McDonald 17.0 ± 2.9 21.7 ± 2.3 2 5.1 ± 4.2 26.8 ± 5.0 LB
BW

n/a: not available, PTB: preterm birth, wga: weeks gestational age, LB: livebirth, and PM: perinatal mortality.

*Documented history-indicated cerclage was performed at 14 weeks gestation. Fifteen cases did not have documented gestational ages at initial cerclage placement.