Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 30;304(7):F982–F990. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00463.2012

Table 1.

Data after after 3 wk of l-NAME treatment

Control NSD l-NAME l-NAME + MMF
(n = 5) (n = 6) (n = 7)
SBP, mmHg 126.2 ± 4.27 175.5 ± 3.05a 176 ± 3.6a
Plasma creatinine, mg/dl 0.30 ± 0.03 0.40 ± 0.03 0.38 ± 0.03
Proteinuria, mg/24 h 2.8 ± 1.39 12.6 ± 4.80 11.5 ± 3.87
GS index, 0–400 0 65.3 ± 7.00a,b 45.7 ± 3.81a
TI damage score, 0–5 0.5 ± 0.21 1.96 ± 0.28a 1.25 ± 0.154
CD68 + cells/mm2 3.4 ± 1.12 88.8 ± 6.93a,c 38.1 ± 5.28a
CD3 + cells/mm2 2.6 ± 1.07 75.3 ± 7.96a,d 42.5 ± 5.17a
AII + cells/mm2 0.8 ± 0.58 28.5 ± 3.51a,c 12.5 ± 1.23a

Studies done in kidney sections harvested after 3 wk of Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) administration in the drinking water (l-NAME group) and l-NAME plus daily mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment (MMF group). Control groups received no treatment. All rats were in a normal (0.4%)-salt diet (NSD). SBP, systolic blood pressure; GS, glomerulosclerosis; TI, tubulointerstitial; AII, angiotensin II-positive. Data are means ± SE.

a

Values higher than controls (P < 0.01 or lower). Differences between l-NAME and l-NAME + MMF groups are

b

P < 0.05,

c

P < 0.001 (multigroup variance analysis), and

d

P < 0.01.