Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 9;1(2):e2. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2172

Table 3.

Questionnaire scores for the 3-dimensional computer graphics (3DCG) model interface (n = 50).

Questionnaire item Response Mean
score
Strongly
agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
disagree
Q13 The interface for interacting with the 3Da content is accessible. 17 26 7 0 0 4.2
Q14 The volume of information in the 3D module is appropriate. 15 26 8 1 0 4.1
Q15 I am satisfied with the 360° rotation of the model. 32 17 1 0 0 4.62
Q16 I am satisfied with the selection menu. 13 35 2 0 0 4.22
Q17 I am satisfied with the show-and-hide function. 21 20 9 0 0 4.24
Q17 I am satisfied with the transparent and opaque function. 13 30 7 0 0 4.12
Q19 I am satisfied with the zoom function. 29 18 3 0 0 4.52
Q20 The screen size is appropriate. 11 26 13 0 0 3.96
Q21 I am satisfied with clicking the mouse to show anatomical terminology. 29 20 1 0 0 4.56
Q22 I am interested in 3DCG. 33 14 3 0 0 4.6
Q23 I am satisfied with the movement menu. 26 21 3 0 0 4.46
Q24 The 3DCG content is of high quality. 18 31 1 0 0 4.34

a 3-dimensional.