Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 1;1(8):180–191. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.18.2000041

Table IV.

Precision and accuracy: for the individualx, y and z coordinate axes for the RSA methods. True mean wear was 0.832 mm (0.01 to 4) for the x and y axes and -0.832 mm (-0.01 to -4) for the z axis (CI, confidence interval)

Precision (n = 15 double measurements) Accuracy (n = 14 mean double measurements)
Wear measurement method* Bias (95% CI)* Sr 95% repeatability limits§ Mean (range) Bias (95% CI)** RMSE††
EGS-RSA (mm)
   x -0.047 (-0.062 to -0.032) 0.020 0.054 0.832 (0.020 to 3.975) 0.000 (-0.026 to 0.026) 0.046
   y -0.040 (-0.058 to -0.022) 0.023 0.065 0.877 (0.058 to 4.130) 0.045 ( 0.018 to 0.072) 0.046
   z 0.090 (0.040 to 0.140) 0.063 0.176 -1.034 (-0.098 to -3.996) -0.202 (-0.270 to -0.034) 0.117
MB-RSA (mm)
   x -0.115 (-0.145 to -0.085) 0.038 0.105 0.804 ( 0.070 to 3.941) -0.028 (-0.061 to 0.005) 0.056
   y -0.063 (-0.087 to -0.039) 0.031 0.085 0.927 ( 0.103 to 4.180) 0.095 ( 0.071 to 0.119) 0.042
   z 0.135 (0.060 to 0.210) 0.096 0.265 -1.346 (-0.324 to -4.222) -0.513 (-0.634 to -0.392) 0.209

* EGS-RSA, RSA method featuring analysis of head penetration by computer-generated geometric sphere models; MB-RSA, RSA method featuring analysis of head penetration by reverse engineered (scanned) cup models † bias: mean difference between the first and the second wear measurement (systematic variation of repeatability for each coordinate axis within the method) ‡ Sr, repeatability standard deviation32 § 95% repeatability limits (1.96Sr × √2): 95% limit on the difference between two test results ¶ mean of two test results (wear analyses) ** bias: the measured wear minus the accepted reference value (true wear) with a 95% CI (systematic -component of accuracy) †† RMSE, root mean square error; standard deviation of the differences between true wear and measured wear (random component of accuracy)