Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 20;48(2 Pt 1):603–627. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01447.x

Table 3.

Multilevel Regressions: Effect of No Obesity-Prevention Service in Jurisdiction (q67f) on Obesity

Pooled Sample Men Women



Dependent Variable (DV) CE p-Value SE PM CE p-Value SE PM CE p-Value SE PM
All-income levels
N = 415,348 N = 166,264 N = 249,084



 DV: Obesity 0.0149 <.0001 0.0017 0.0027 −0.0457 <.0001 0.0024 −0.0079 0.0686 <.0001 0.0025 0.0118
 DV: Morbid obesity 0.2267 <.0001 0.0044 0.0049 0.0855 <.0001 0.0071 0.0015 0.2690 <.0001 0.0055 0.0064
Low-income sample (income <$35,000)
N = 118,972 N = 40,689 N = 78,283



 DV: Obesity 0.1051 <.0001 0.0034 0.0232 0.1110 <.0001 0.0054 0.0218 0.1133 <.0001 0.0046 0.0244
 DV: Morbid obesity 0.4986 <.0001 0.0074 0.0161 −0.0082 0.4785 0.0115 −0.0082 0.7705 <.0001 0.0087 0.0352

Control variables include the following: at individual-level, household size and its squared term, number of children and its squared term, 5-year interval age indicators, gender (when pooled), marital status, education, employment, income, race, interview month; at county/local health department level, health department organization, county urbanization code, county-level median household income variable; and an indicator of year 2005 (baseline: year 2004).

The model used is a multilevel logistic regression with three levels: individual, county, and state. State specific intercepts are assumed to be fixed.

CE, coefficient estimate; DV, dependent variable; PM, predicted marginal (calculated as the difference in the changes of the predicted probabilities of [morbid] obesity from 2004 to 2005 between those residing in counties with a positive response to q67a and those residing in counties with a negative response).