Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 8;13:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-13-16

Table 3.

Comparison of demographic characteristics of participants with and without unitary incontinence

Characteristic
Category of participant (N =598)
Pearson X2
p value
  Women with UI (n=202) frequency (%) Women with-out UI (n=396) frequency (%)    
Age in years
(M =46.6, SD =9.46)
(M =32.9, SD =10.02)
 
 
 20-29
6 (3)
171(43.2)
179.67
< .01
 30-39
46 (22.8)
140(35.4)
 40-49
64 (31.7)
50(12.6)
 50-60
86 (42.6)
35(8.8)
Body Mass Index (BMI)
(M=25.53, SD =3.79)
(M =22.01, SD =2.76)
 
 
 Underweight (< 18.5)
4 (2)
30(7.6)
131.21
< .01
 Normal (18.8 -24. 9)
94 (46.5)
326(82.3)
 Over weight (25–29.9)
78 (38.6)
36(9.1)
 Obese ( > 30)
26 (12.9)
4(1)
Marital Status
 
 
 
 
 Single
0 (0)
21(5.3)
40.30
< .01
 Married
158 (78.2)
351(88.6)
 Widow
44 (21.8)
24(6.1)
Level of Educational
 
 
 
 
 No formal education
15 (7.4)
12(3.1)
31.06
< .01
 Primary School level
99 (49)
134(33.8)
 Secondary School level
26 (12.9)
113(28.5)
 Graduate level
58 (28.7)
117(29.5)
 Postgraduate level
4 (2)
20(5.1)
Occupation
 
 
 
 
 House wife
116 (57.4)
216(54.5)
13.21
< .01
 House Helper or Maid
32 (15.8)
42(10.6)
 Office Clerk
22 (10.9)
46(11.6)
 School Teacher
8 (4)
26(6.6)
 Self Employed
18 (8.9)
29(7.3)
 Professional 6 (3) 37(9.3)    

M: Mean; SD: Standard deviation; UI: Urinary incontinence; X2: Chi-square.